IDENTIFICATION OF NONLINEAR MODEL OF ANKLE JOINT DYNAMICS DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF SOLEUS

被引:5
|
作者
FLAHERTY, B
ROBINSON, C
AGARWAL, G
机构
[1] EDWARD HINES VET ADM MED CTR,CTR REHABIL RES & DEV,HINES,IL
[2] LOYOLA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL,MAYWOOD,IL
[3] UNIV ILLINOIS,DEPT ELECT ENGN & COMP SCI,CHICAGO,IL
关键词
FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; JOINT COMPLIANCE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF02510527
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The mechanical impedance of-the ankle joint was estimated in two conditions: during submaximal surface electrical stimulation of the soleus muscle, and with no stimulation applied. Both neurologically intact (n = 5) and spinal cord injured subjects (n = 4) were used. The mechanical impedance was measured by applying angular step and constant velocity (13-100 degrees s(-1)) perturbations at 10 degrees to the ankle and measuring the resulting changes in torque. A five-element lumped model consisting of an inertial element, a parallel elastic element, and an elastic element in series with a viscous element and a pure tension generator produced a good fit for predicting the compliance characteristics of the ankle for both the relaxed and stimulated conditions. The elastic elements were piecewise linear with different values for the dorsiflexion and plantarflexion directions. The viscous element was velocity-dependent and it decreased in value as the velocity increased. The average torque error between the measured and model's response during soleus stimulation was 10.56% for the dorsiflexed and 11.93% for the plantarflexed perturbations. However, the average error was skewed by several subjects who had excessive error, due to volitional intervention or flexor withdrawal reflex. The average model error for the perturbations without stimulation was 7.12% for dorsiflexed and 5.58% for plantarflexed perturbations.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 439
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION WITH PT ELECTRODES .7. DISSOLUTION OF PT ELECTRODES DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE CAT CEREBRAL-CORTEX
    ROBBLEE, LS
    MCHARDY, J
    AGNEW, WF
    BULLARA, LA
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1983, 9 (04) : 301 - 308
  • [42] Identification of time varying stiffness dynamics of the human ankle joint during an imposed movement
    Kirsch, RF
    Kearney, RE
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 114 (01) : 71 - 85
  • [43] ABSENCE OF CONSISTENT EFFECTS OF REPETITIVE TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION ON SOLEUS H-REFLEX IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
    GOULET, C
    ARSENAULT, AB
    LEVIN, MF
    BOURBONNAIS, D
    LEPAGE, Y
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (10): : 1132 - 1136
  • [44] An Impedance Control of Human Ankle Joint using Functional Electrical Stimulation
    Kim, Junyoung
    Kim, Jonghyun
    2018 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB2018), 2018, : 1230 - 1235
  • [45] MECHANICAL AND METABOLIC ALTERATIONS IN RAT DIAPHRAGM DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    MASSARELLI, PS
    GREEN, HJ
    HUGHSON, RL
    SHARRATT, MT
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 67 (01) : 210 - 220
  • [47] RAPID FATIGUE OF NEUROPEPTIDE SECRETION DURING CONTINUAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    INGRAM, CD
    BICKNELL, RJ
    BROWN, D
    LENG, G
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 1982, 35 (06) : 424 - 428
  • [48] GOLDFISH MUSCLE ENERGY-METABOLISM DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    VANWAARDE, A
    KESBEKE, F
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1983, 75 (04): : 635 - 639
  • [49] BONE-GROWTH AND IMPEDANCE, THEIR RELATIONSHIP DURING ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    PATERSON, D
    COLLINS, P
    VERNONROBERTS, B
    PFEIFFER, D
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1982, 64 (01): : 118 - 118
  • [50] Elastic ankle exoskeletons influence soleus fascicle dynamics during unexpected perturbations
    Williamson, James L.
    Lichtwark, Glen A.
    Dick, Taylor J. M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 159