Use and Effects of Patient Access to Medical Records in General Practice Through a Personal Health Record in the Netherlands: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study

被引:2
|
作者
Vreugdenhil, Maria M. T. [1 ]
Kool, Rudolf B. [1 ]
van Boven, Kees [2 ]
Assendelft, Willem J. J. [2 ]
Kremer, Jan A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Sci Ctr Qual Healthcare, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, 114 IQ Healthcare,POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Primary & Community Care, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2018年 / 7卷 / 09期
关键词
health records; patient access to records; patient participation; personal; decision making; shared; medication adherence; patient-centered care; self-management;
D O I
10.2196/10193
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the Dutch health care system, general practitioners hold a central position. They store information from all health care providers who are involved with their patients in their electronic health records. Web-based access to the summary record in general practice through a personal health record (PHR) may increase patients' insight into their medical conditions and help them to be involved in their care. Objective: We describe the protocol that we will use to investigate the utilization of patients' digital access to the summary of their medical records in general practice through a PHR and its effects on the involvement of patients in their care. Methods: We will conduct a multilevel mixed-methods study in which the PHR and Web-based access to the summary record will be offered for 6 months to a random sample of 500 polypharmacy patients, 500 parents of children aged <4 years, and 500 adults who do not belong to the former two groups. At the patient level, a controlled before-after study will be conducted using surveys, and concurrently, qualitative data will be collected from focus group discussions, think-aloud observations, and semistructured interviews. At the general practice staff (GP staff) level, focus group discussions will be conducted at baseline and Q-methodology inquiries at the end of the study period. The primary outcomes at the patient level are barriers and facilitators for using the PHR and summary records and changes in taking an active role in decision making and care management and medication adherence. Outcomes at the GP staff level are attitudes before and opinions after the implementation of the intervention. Patient characteristics and changes in outcomes related to patient involvement during the study period will be compared between the users and nonusers of the intervention using chi-square tests and t tests. A thematic content analysis of the qualitative data will be performed, and the results will be used to interpret quantitative findings. Results: Enrollment was completed in May 2017 and the possibility to view GP records through the PHR was implemented in December 2017. Data analysis is currently underway and the first results are expected to be submitted for publication in autumn 2019. Conclusions: We expect that the findings of this study will be useful to health care providers and health care organizations that consider introducing the use of PHR and Web-based access to records and to those who have recently started using these.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] General practice and patient characteristics associated with personal continuity: a mixed-methods study
    te Winkel, Marije T.
    Slottje, Pauline
    de Kruif, Anja J. T. C. M.
    Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
    van Marum, Rob J.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Uijen, Annemarie A.
    Bont, Jettie
    Maarsingh, Otto R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (724): : E780 - E789
  • [2] Health and access to healthcare in homeless people Protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Bedmar, Miguel A.
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    Artigas-Lelong, Berta
    Salva-Mut, Francesca
    Pou, Joan
    Capitan-Moyano, Laura
    Garcia-Toro, Mauro
    Yanez, Aina M.
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (07) : E28816
  • [3] Access to Resources in the Community Through Navigation: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study
    Dahrouge, Simone
    Gauthier, Alain
    Chiocchio, Francois
    Presseau, Justin
    Kendall, Claire
    Lemonde, Manon
    Chomienne, Marie-Helene
    Perna, Andrea
    Toal-Sullivan, Darene
    Devlin, Rose A.
    Timony, Patrick
    Prud'homme, Denis
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [4] Developing patient reference groups within general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Smiddy, Jane
    Reay, Joanne
    Peckham, Stephen
    Williams, Lorraine
    Wilson, Patricia
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2015, 65 (632): : E177 - E183
  • [5] Expanding general practice with interprofessional teams: a mixed-methods patient perspective study
    Abelsen, Birgit
    Pedersen, Kine
    Loyland, Hanna Isabel
    Aandahl, Emilie
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [6] Expanding general practice with interprofessional teams: a mixed-methods patient perspective study
    Birgit Abelsen
    Kine Pedersen
    Hanna Isabel Løyland
    Emilie Aandahl
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [7] GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study
    O'Brien, Emer
    Walsh, Aisling
    Boland, Fiona
    Collins, Claire
    Harkins, Velma
    Smith, Susan M.
    O'Herlihy, Noirin
    Clyne, Barbara
    Wallace, Emma
    [J]. BJGP OPEN, 2023, 7 (04)
  • [8] Is Blockchain Technology Suitable for Managing Personal Health Records? Mixed-Methods Study to Test Feasibility
    Park, Yu Rang
    Lee, Eunsol
    Na, Wonjun
    Park, Sungjun
    Lee, Yura
    Lee, Jae-Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (02)
  • [9] Migrant physicians' choice of employment and the medical specialty general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Sturesson, Linda
    Palmgren, Per J.
    Ohlander, Magnus
    Nilsson, Gunnar H.
    Stenfors, Terese
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [10] Migrant physicians’ choice of employment and the medical specialty general practice: a mixed-methods study
    Linda Sturesson
    Per J. Palmgren
    Magnus Öhlander
    Gunnar H. Nilsson
    Terese Stenfors
    [J]. Human Resources for Health, 19