POWER AND CURRENT DECOMPOSITIONS INTO TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN COMPONENTS - ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON

被引:0
|
作者
CRISTALDI, L
FERRERO, A
FURGA, GS
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Many different theories can be found in the literature coping with the decomposition of powers and currents in electrical systems under non-sinusoidal conditions. The main difference between them lies in the domain where the decomposition is obtained. This paper analyses both a time-domain and a frequency-domain decomposition of powers and currents in three-phase systems and shows how the comparison between their results gives much more information than the results of a single decomposition about the load identification and the way the non-active components of power and current can be compensated.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 369
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis and comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain input shaping
    Pao, LY
    Cutforth, CF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1998 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 1998, : 3072 - 3074
  • [2] Comparison of frequency measurement between time-domain and frequency-domain in DSO
    Wei, J
    Chen, CL
    [J]. 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS: VOL 1: COMMUNICATION THEORY AND SYSTEMS, 2005, : 808 - 811
  • [3] Comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain fluorescence lifetime tomography
    Kumar, Anand T. N.
    Raymond, Scott B.
    Bacskai, Brian J.
    Boas, David A.
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2008, 33 (05) : 470 - 472
  • [4] Cognitive processing in sleep as revealed by time-domain and frequency-domain components
    Karakas, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 69 (03) : 154 - 154
  • [5] Influence of current and seabed friction on mooring cable response: Comparison between time-domain and frequency-domain analysis
    Liu, YG
    Bergdahl, L
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1997, 19 (11) : 945 - 953
  • [6] FLIM Phasor Analysis for Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Data
    Gratton, Enrico
    Digman, Michelle A.
    Stringari, Chiara
    Arnesano, Cosimo
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 104 (02) : 347A - 347A
  • [7] TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC SCATTERING BY SPHERES
    THORNE, PD
    BRUDNER, TJ
    WATERS, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 95 (05): : 2478 - 2487
  • [8] ON FREQUENCY-DOMAIN AND TIME-DOMAIN PHASE UNWRAPPING
    ZIMMERMANN, KP
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1987, 75 (04) : 519 - 520
  • [9] COMPARISON OF TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN ANTENNA THEORY
    YOUNG, JD
    SVOBODA, DE
    BURNSIDE, WD
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1973, AP21 (04) : 581 - 583
  • [10] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    Hernandez-Becerra, P. A. I.
    Balleza-Ordaz, M.
    Vargas-Luna, M.
    Delgadillo-Holtfort, I.
    [J]. INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 62 (02) : 241 - 246