CT Simulation to Evaluate of Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage in Conventional Radiotherapy Fields Based on Bone and Vessels Landmarks in Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:4
|
作者
Kashi, Amir Shahram Yousefi [1 ]
Khaledi, Samira [2 ]
Houshyari, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Radiotherapy Planning; Computed Tomography (CT) Simulation; Pelvic Vessels; Pelvic Lymph Nodes;
D O I
10.17795/ijcp-6233
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Radiotherapy is the gold standard for treatment of prostrate cancer as it can cover an adequate area of tissues at risk for metastasis. Objectives: We evaluated the Pelvic lymph node coverage of conventional radiotherapy fields based on bone and vessels landmarks using computed tomography (CT) simulation in patients with prostate cancer referred to Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital. Patients and Methods: In this cross sectional study, 40 patients with prostate cancer at the Stage T1c to T3b were studied. Pelvic lymph nodes were contoured by using pelvic vessels as surrogate markers. The distances were measured at different points of anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral fields and distances > 5 mm or more between the contoured nodes and the field borders. Results: Mean and standard deviation of the aortic bifurcation from the superior border was 4.73 +/- 1.16 cm, the distance of common iliac bifurcation from the superior border was 1.11 +/- 1.25 cm, the mean (SD) distance of right external iliac from the lateral border of AP field was 2.06 +/- 0.48 cm and for left external iliac artery was 1.90 +/- 0.56 cm. The distance of the external iliac artery from the anterior border of the lateral field was 2.30 +/- 0.74 cm. The distance of the external iliac artery from pelvic rim was 0.59 +/- 0.59 cm, distance of bifurcation of iliac from sacroiliac joint was 0.82 +/- 1.01 cm, the size of the pelvic rim was 12.30 +/- 0.64 cm, sacral width was 8.29 +/- 1.01 cm, anterior promontory symphysis distance was 12.02 +/- 0.92 cm and posterior promontory symphysis distance was 10.98 +/- 0.73 cm. Conclusions: We observed that conventional radiotherapy using CT simulation based on bone and vessels landmarks provided adequate coverage of pelvic lymph nodes in our patients with prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ANALYSIS OF PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER BASED ON EXTENSION OF PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
    Maas, Marissa
    Nassiri, Nima
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Thalmann, George
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Eastham, James
    Evans, Christopher
    Karnes, Jeffrey
    Abreu, Andre
    Briganti, Alberto
    Artibani, Walter
    Gill, Inderbir
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Cacciamani, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E266 - E266
  • [22] Radiotherapy dose escalation on pelvic lymph node control in patients with cervical cancer
    Gogineni, Emile
    Bloom, Beatrice
    Molina, Ferney Diaz
    Villella, Jeannine
    Goenka, Anuj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (04) : 524 - 529
  • [23] Clinical outcomes of definitive whole pelvic radiotherapy for clinical lymph node metastatic prostate cancer
    Tsuchida, Keisuke
    Inaba, Koji
    Kashihara, Tairo
    Murakami, Naoya
    Okuma, Kae
    Takahashi, Kana
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    Nakayama, Yuko
    Maejima, Aiko
    Shinoda, Yasuo
    Matsui, Yoshiyuki
    Komiyama, Motokiyo
    Fujimoto, Hiroyuki
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Sumi, Minako
    Nakano, Takashi
    Itami, Jun
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (18): : 6629 - 6637
  • [24] When is Elective Pelvic Lymph Node Irradiation Indicated in Definitive Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer?
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Nichols, R. Charles
    Henderson, Randal H.
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2013, 36 (06): : 644 - 647
  • [25] Comparison of 3 T mpMRI and pelvic CT examinations for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer
    Valentin, B.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Demetrescu, D.
    Morawitz, J.
    Al-Monajjed, R.
    Quentin, M.
    Kirchner, J.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 147
  • [26] Pelvic lymph node recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer following prostate-only radiotherapy
    Hussain, Sameed
    Wajid, Muhammad Imran
    Omer, Muhammad
    Khan, Muhammad Yousuf
    Maqsood, Talha
    Zeb, Adnan
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 22
  • [27] Diagnostic performance of PET-CT compared to conventional CT for lymph node staging in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection
    Longoni, M.
    Scilipoti, P.
    De Angelis, M.
    Re, C.
    Bertini, A.
    Avesani, G.
    Basile, G.
    Nocera, L.
    Gandaglia, G.
    Salonia, A.
    Montorsi, F.
    Briganti, A.
    Moschini, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [28] Extended Salvage Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Osmonov, Daniar K.
    Aksenov, Alexey V.
    Boller, Annkathrin
    Kalz, Almut
    Heimann, Diana
    Janssen, Isa
    Juenemann, Klaus-Peter
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2014, 2014
  • [29] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF PET-CT COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL CT FOR LYMPH NODE STAGING IN BLADDER CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
    Longoni, Mattia
    Scilipoti, Pietro
    De Angelis, Mario
    Re, Chiara
    Bertini, Alessandro
    Avesani, Giulio
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Nocera, Luigi
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Salonia, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Moschini, Marco
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E633 - E634
  • [30] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS WITH PELVIC LYMPH NODE METASTASES: THE ROLE OF RADIOTHERAPY
    Ferrari, A.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    Fanti, P.
    Bonora, M.
    Fodor, C.
    Zerini, D.
    Vavassori, A.
    Ivaldi, G. B.
    Dell'Acqua, V.
    De Cobelli, O.
    Orecchia, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S409 - S409