Risk Factors for Peripartum Wound Dehiscence

被引:2
|
作者
Kingsbury, Beena [1 ]
Rathore, Swati [1 ]
Chelliah, Hepsy [2 ]
Londhe, Vaibhav [1 ]
Benjamin, Santosh Joseph [1 ]
Mathews, Jiji [1 ]
机构
[1] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 7th Floor,ISSCC Bldg, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Biostat, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Episiotomy; Induction of labour; Instrumental delivery; Obesity; Surgical site infection;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2018/37763.12232
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Wound Dehiscence (WD) following Vaginal Delivery (VD) or Cesarean Delivery (CD) causes considerable discomfort to the woman, leading to significant physical, emotional and financial burden. The rate of Perineal Wound Dehiscence (PWD) is relatively low and more common with instrumental delivery. However, there is minimal information on the incidence and risk factors causing WD, especially for PWD. Aim: To assess the incidence and risk factors of peripartum wound dehiscence. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a large tertiary care centre where there were 14759 deliveries. 4671 women had caesarean deliveries and 10.088 women had the vaginal delivery. There were 86 cases (0.8%) of WD in the VD group and 95 (2%) in the CD group. These cases were compared with twice as many controls. Results: Induction of Labour (IOL) and BMI >30 kg/m(2) were more common in cases compared to controls in the CD group. However, on multivariate analysis. this association was not seen. IOL, meconium stained liquor (MSAF), instrumental delivery and use of episiotomy was more common among cases than controls in the VD group. IOL did not show up as an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: An association between IOL, primigravidae, instrumental delivery and MSAF was seen with peripartum WD.
引用
收藏
页码:QC8 / QC11
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Adults: Development and Validation of a Risk Model
    van Ramshorst, Gabrielle H.
    Nieuwenhuizen, Jeroen
    Hop, Wim C. J.
    Arends, Pauline
    Boom, Johan
    Jeekel, Johannes
    Lange, Johan F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [42] Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Adults: Development and Validation of a Risk Model
    Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst
    Jeroen Nieuwenhuizen
    Wim C. J. Hop
    Pauline Arends
    Johan Boom
    Johannes Jeekel
    Johan F. Lange
    World Journal of Surgery, 2010, 34 : 20 - 27
  • [43] ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
    REITAMO, J
    MOLLER, C
    ACTA CHIRURGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1972, 138 (02): : 170 - +
  • [44] ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
    KEILL, RH
    KEITZER, WF
    NICHOLS, WK
    HENZEL, J
    DEWEESE, MS
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1973, 106 (04) : 573 - 577
  • [45] ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
    BURKITT, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 2 (6082): : 318 - 318
  • [46] Postoperative wound dehiscence
    Pleyer, U
    Hartmann, C
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (09) : 1864 - 1865
  • [47] CATARACT WOUND DEHISCENCE
    MOADEL, K
    SAMBURSKY, DL
    DODICK, JM
    SPERBER, LTD
    SALEVITZ, MI
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 884 - 884
  • [48] ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
    WALTERS, GA
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1961, 2 (524): : 452 - +
  • [49] ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
    NAZZARO, R
    CONNECTICUT MEDICINE, 1974, 38 (12) : 652 - 655
  • [50] ABDOMINAL WOUND DEHISCENCE
    HELMKAMP, BF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1977, 128 (07) : 803 - 807