Relationship between coal consumption and economic growth for OECD and non-OECD countries

被引:6
|
作者
Jin, Taeyoung [1 ]
Kim, Jinsoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Coal consumption; economic growth; panel unit root; panel cointegration;
D O I
10.1080/12269328.2015.1087348
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study uses panel cointegration tests to examine the relationship between coal consumption and economic growth for OECD and non-OECD countries. We formulate a hypothesis that developing countries have a more powerful relationship since coal is generally used in the early stage of economic development. To prove this hypothesis, we analyse 58 countries for the period 1971-2010 and those 58 countries into two groups: OECD and non-OECD. We use three-panel unit root tests for robustness of the test results. The results indicate that all panel data are non-stationary. Then, we apply two cointegration tests to confirm the long-run equilibrium between coal consumption and economic growth. One is based on an error correction model and the other on residuals. The cointegration test results indicate that coal consumption and economic growth have long-run equilibrium in OECD countries. In contrast, coal consumption and economic growth have no long-run relationship in non-OECD countries. In addition, we investigate the coal consumption of the iron and electricity generation sectors. The results are same as with the total coal consumption case. Consequently, only OECD countries have a long-run equilibrium relationship in coal consumption of the iron and electricity generation sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 56
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OECD and non-OECD trade liberalisation and poverty reduction in seven developing countries
    Hertel, TW
    Preckel, PV
    Cranfield, JAL
    Ivanic, M
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL TRADE AND POVERTY MAKING: POLICY ANALYSIS COUNT, 2003, : 195 - 212
  • [23] Does static and dynamic relationship between economic growth and energy consumption exist in OECD countries?
    Kahouli, Bassem
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2019, 5 : 104 - 116
  • [24] What matters in educational performance? Evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries
    Barra C.
    Boccia M.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2022, 56 (6) : 4335 - 4394
  • [25] A Comparative Analysis of the Future Cost of Electricity Generation in OECD and Non-OECD Countries
    West, Jason
    [J]. Electricity Journal, 2012, 25 (01): : 68 - 83
  • [26] Does environmental tax kill employment? Evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries
    Domguia, Edmond Noubissi
    Pondie, Thierry Messie
    Ngounou, Borice Augustin
    Nkengfack, Hilaire
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [27] Exploring the efficiency of new energy generation: Evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries
    Xu, Xin Long
    Qiao, Sen
    Chen, Hsing Hung
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 31 (03) : 389 - 404
  • [28] Informed consent: Legalities, perspectives of physicians and patients, and practices in OECD/non-OECD countries
    Shenoy, Amrita
    Shenoy, Gopinath N.
    Shenoy, Gayatri G.
    [J]. MEDECINE PALLIATIVE, 2022, 21 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [29] Financial development and tax evasion: International evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries
    Allam, Amir
    Abou-El-Sood, Heba
    Elmarzouky, Mahmoud
    Yamen, Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2024, 57
  • [30] The measurement of the level of support in selected non-OECD countries
    Melyukhina, O
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL POLICIES IN CHINA AFTER WTO ACCESSION, 2002, : 262 - 283