Animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare

被引:2
|
作者
Algers, Bo
Blokhuis, Harry J.
Broom, Donald M.
Costa, Patrizia
Domingo, Mariano
Greiner, Mathias
Guemene, Daniel
Hartung, Jorg
Koenen, Frank
Muller-Graf, Christine
Morton, David B.
Osterhaus, Albert
Pfeiffer, Dirk U.
Roberts, Ron
Sanaa, Moez
Salman, Mo
Sharp, J. Michael
Vannier, Philippe
Wierup, Martin
Wooldridge, Marion
机构
关键词
Pig Welfare; pig disease; fattening pigs; weaner; grower; finisher; husbandry; pen design; housing system;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2007.564
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Council Directive 91/630/EEC2, as amended, laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, requires the Commission to submit to the Council a report, based on a scientific opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), concerning the welfare various aspects of housing and husbandry systems for farmed pigs. EFSA has therefore been required to provide a Scientific Opinion on several aspects of this, one concerning fattening pigs. The opinion should include: the effects of stocking density, including group size and grouping methods, space requirements and the impact of stall design and different flooring types taking into account different climatic conditions. The Scientific Opinion was adopted by the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on 6 September 2007. Based on the scientific data presented in the Scientific Report and risk assessment, conclusions and recommendations were drawn. In relation to disease, respiratory and gastrointestinal infections and production-related diseases can have a major impact on the welfare of fattening pigs. Management, inspection and other disease prevention measures, handling, hygiene, floor type and the manure system have major effects on disease risk and significant importance for ensuring good welfare. At post-mortem slaughter inspection, pigs kept outdoors usually have a lower prevalence of lesions due to respiratory infections than indoor pigs but higher risk of some internal parasites. Leg disorders, which are caused by a complex of factors including genetic selection and high energy and high protein diet, are a major problem. Interactions between many aspects of the biological functioning of pigs and effects of housing and management on welfare are described. Without suitable rooting and manipulation materials, pigs are likely to direct tactile behaviour towards companions using aggression or other causes of poor welfare. Manipulable material makes any floor more attractive for exploration and pigs prefer the presence of straw to an unbedded floor. The provision of appropriate foraging material is difficult in pens with fully slatted floors unless there is automatic shredding in the waste disposal system. If the ambient temperatures are too high, adequate space to separate from other pigs, sufficient contact with a cool floor, access to outdoors, air-flow rates to help evaporation, water on the skin, or more drinking water help to avoid over-heating. In the case of too low a temperature, better insulation of the floor lowers the risk of hypothermia. When there is too little sensory input, because of social isolation, a barren environment or too little light intensity, pigs are likely to show abnormal behavioural and physiological responses. Flashing lights can be disturbing to pigs and poor welfare is also associated with light of a wavelength or intensity that does not allow the pig to discriminate the behaviour of other pigs or materials. The genetic selection for rapid growth and lean meat without enough consideration of other factors has led to some widespread and serious problems. However, selective breeding to eliminate the halothane gene has improved pig welfare. Poor quality pen design can cause poor welfare in pigs because of parts that cause injury, or disturbance and aggression. If pigs do not have sufficient exercise, there can be adverse effects on bone and muscle development. Dunging behaviour (urination and defecation) is facilitated by design of the housing system and good management. Mixing unacquainted pigs leads to a substantial risk of fighting, injury and production loss. Recommendations presented in the Scientific Opinion include the need to provide an environment and management so that the negative consequences of poor welfare such as injurious behaviours, physiological problems and immunosuppression, caused in barren environments, are avoided. In this sense, it is recommended that pigs should be provided with manipulable, destructible materials, wallows, lighting of appropriate wavelength and intensity, water of a quality and quantity sufficient for their needs, and a balanced diet with no harmful contaminants. In order to minimise disease in pigs, and hence poor welfare, effective disease preventive and management procedures should be in place. The design of accommodation for pigs should be such that the pigs have sufficient exercise for normal bone and muscle development. There should be further efforts to select and breed so that problems of pig welfare, including cardiovascular malfunction, risk of early death and leg disorders are maintained at a low level. The recommendations for further research are mainly focused on the evaluation of the effects of the exposure to several factors (i.e. barren environment, light intensity, noise, respiratory disorders) on the welfare of fattening pigs. Recommendations for further research in relation to the heavy pig production are also provided. The methodology and the results of this scientific report and opinion should be developed to identify welfare outcomes (indicators) that are valid and can be used in an animal welfare monitoring system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Issues of animal welfare in the housing of cattle and pigs
    von Borell, E
    [J]. ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 1998, 70 (06): : 436 - 445
  • [33] ANIMAL WELFARE AND INTENSIVE HUSBANDRY
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1973, 93 (26) : 657 - 657
  • [34] Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare in pigs
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Joerg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (01)
  • [35] Control and eradication of Classic Swine Fever in wild boar1 Scientific opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
    Osterhaus, Albert
    Botner, Anette
    Algers, Bo
    Mueller-Graf, Christine
    Guemene, Daniel
    Morton, David B.
    Pfeiffer, Dirk U.
    Broom, Donald M.
    Koenen, Frank
    Blokhuis, Harry J.
    Sharp, J. Michael
    Hartung, Joerg
    Domingo, Mariano
    Wierup, Martin
    Greiner, Matthias
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Costa, Patrizia
    Vannier, Philippe
    Roberts, Ron
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (01):
  • [36] Scientific Opinion on the electrical requirements for waterbath stunning equipment applicable for poultry EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Jorg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (06)
  • [37] SOME ENVIRONMENTALLY EVOKED ANIMAL HEALTH AND WELFARE PROBLEMS IN MODERN HUSBANDRY
    EKESBO, I
    [J]. ANIMAL REGULATION STUDIES, 1980, 3 (1-2): : 119 - 128
  • [38] Welfare of fattening pigs in different husbandry systems
    Weber, R
    Zárate, AV
    [J]. IMPROVING HEALTH AND WELFARE IN ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 2000, (102): : 117 - 125
  • [39] Scientific Opinion on the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza and its potential implications for animal health EFSA Panel Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald M.
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Joerg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Osterhaus, Albert
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James Michael
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, Anthony John
    Wierup., Martin
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (10)
  • [40] ANIMAL WELFARE Correlation between health and welfare
    Berkshire, Duncan
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2018, 182 (26) : 749 - 749