Partial and Total Productivity Measurement Models for Garment Manufacturing Firms

被引:0
|
作者
Matebu, Amare [1 ]
Shibabaw, Migibar [1 ]
机构
[1] Bahirdar Univ, Inst Technol, Ind Engn, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
来源
JORDAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING | 2015年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
Productivity Measurement Model; Partial Productivity; Total Productivity; Garment Manufacturing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to explore the productivity measures typically used in Ethiopian garment manufacturing firms and its shortcomings. A case study was carried out at NGM manufacturing firm. The analysis of existing productivity measures indicates that the firm does not have proper and systematic productivity measures to monitor its productivity performance. Garment manufacturing firms did not determine the resource (labor, material, machine, energy, etc.) utilization rate and considered productivity as an equivalent to labor productivity. Partial and total productivity measurement models are developed and applied to monitor the productivity status of the firm. The models are tested using the data of five consecutive fiscal years (2007/8 to 2011/12) collected from NGM firm. Accordingly, the partial productivity indices of the firm for current year (2011/12), as compare to base year (2009/10), for each input factor (human, material, capital, energy and miscellaneous input factors) are 2.36, 0.64, 0.51, 2.25 and 1.09, respectively. The total productivity index of the current year is 0.75. Furthermore, the partial and total productivity analysis trends of NGM firm were computed in the same fiscal years. All partial productivity indices of the company during the period of 2008/9 showed a decline as compared to the base period (2009/10) which is the lowest productivity in the specified period. The total productivity index also showed the lowest (a decline by 73%) in the same period. Therefore, the developed partial and total productivity measurement models had the scope to portray the firm's performance in a comprehensive manner. (C) 2015 Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 176
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of the digital economy on the total factor productivity of manufacturing firms: Empirical evidence from China
    Li, Huanjie
    Zhang, Yuan
    Li, Yan
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 207
  • [22] Digital transformation and total factor productivity in manufacturing firms: Evidence of corporate public responsibilities in China
    Ding, Xiangan
    Appolloni, Andrea
    Shahzad, Mohsin
    Liu, Yue
    Han, Shaojie
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2025, 82
  • [23] Trade liberalization and productivity of Indian manufacturing firms
    Goldar, Bishwanath
    Chawla, Isha
    Behera, Smruti Ranjan
    INDIAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2019, 13 (01) : 73 - 98
  • [24] Labor productivity growth in Greek manufacturing firms
    Theodore Papadogonas
    Fotini Voulgaris
    Operational Research, 2005, 5 (3) : 459 - 472
  • [25] THE EFFECT OF ACCESSIBILITY ON PRODUCTIVITY IN SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS
    Martin-Barroso, David
    Nunez-Serrano, Juan A.
    Velazquez, Francisco J.
    JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (05) : 708 - 735
  • [26] IT, enterprise reform, and productivity in Chinese manufacturing firms
    Motohashi, Kazuyuki
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 19 (04) : 325 - 333
  • [27] Technological spillovers and productivity in Italian manufacturing firms
    Medda, Giuseppe
    Piga, Claudio A.
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2014, 41 (03) : 419 - 434
  • [28] PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH AND COMPETITION IN TUNISIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS
    Amri, Fethi
    Mouelhi, Rim
    REGION ET DEVELOPPEMENT, 2013, (37): : 37 - 64
  • [29] Technological spillovers and productivity in Italian manufacturing firms
    Giuseppe Medda
    Claudio A. Piga
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2014, 41 : 419 - 434
  • [30] Productivity Measurement of Manufacturing System
    Rawat, Govind Singh
    Gupta, Ashutosh
    Juneja, Chandan
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (01) : 1483 - 1489