SURROGATE END-POINT BIOMARKER ASSAYS IN PHASE-II CHEMOPREVENTION CLINICAL-TRIALS

被引:0
|
作者
LIPKIN, M [1 ]
BHANDARI, M [1 ]
HAKISSIAN, M [1 ]
CROLL, W [1 ]
WONG, G [1 ]
机构
[1] STRANG CANC PREVENT CTR, NEW YORK, NY 10021 USA
关键词
BIOMARKERS; CHEMOPREVENTION; COLON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Surrogate endpoint biomarker (SEB) assays carried out in rodent models have benefitted from large amounts of available colonic tissue, abundant well-aligned colonic crypts, and population groups with fairly uniform biological characteristics. In contrast, SEB assays in human colon studies have often been tarried out on, small groups of subjects, without the advantages inherent in rodent studies. Some factors that contribute to variations in human colon SEB assays include differences in genetic background, the extent and duration of previous colonic diseases, degree of previous chronic irritation to the colonic mucosa, the initial levels of nutrients ingested prior to the study, administration of large volumes of fluid prior to SEB measurement which induce hypermetabolic and then quiescent changes in the mucosa, failure to use strict morphologic criteria in counting colonic crypts, and availability of only a small number of crypts for analysis. Measurements of adenoma recurrence over short durations are limited by factors that include a large potential miss-rate of small adenomas, a window of observation with short duration which limits the stage of adenoma observed, and the consequent inability to measure mechanisms that a chemopreventive intervention is affecting in a different stage of adenoma development. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH VINDESINE IN PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    MATHE, G
    HULHOVEN, R
    SOKAL, G
    BAYSSAS, M
    BELPOMME, D
    BOSLY, A
    CORNU, G
    DELANNOY, A
    DELUCA, L
    DEVASSAL, F
    FERRANT, A
    GOUVEIA, J
    HAYAT, M
    JASMIN, C
    MACHOVER, D
    MICHAUX, JL
    MISSET, JL
    MUSSET, M
    PICO, JL
    RIBAUD, P
    SCHWARTZENBERG, L
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1981, 1 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [22] PREREQUISITES FOR PHASE-I AND PHASE-II OF DRUG CLINICAL-TRIALS
    JAILLON, P
    DUPUIS, B
    ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX, 1989, 82 (10): : 1773 - 1776
  • [23] PHASE-I, PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS
    GARCES, R
    SCANLON, E
    PRASAD, SG
    KHANDEKAR, JD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (10): : 1828 - 1828
  • [25] APPLICATION OF THE TRIANGULAR TEST TO PHASE-II CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS
    BELLISSANT, E
    BENICHOU, J
    CHASTANG, C
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (08) : 907 - 917
  • [26] A BAYESIAN-APPROACH TO THE DESIGN OF PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS
    SYLVESTER, RJ
    BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 823 - 836
  • [27] TISSUE AUTOFLUORESCENCE AS AN INTERMEDIATE END-POINT IN CANCER CHEMOPREVENTION TRIALS
    SCHANTZ, SP
    ALFANO, RR
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, : 199 - 204
  • [28] PLANNED VERSUS ATTAINED DESIGN IN PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS
    GREEN, SJ
    DAHLBERG, S
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (07) : 853 - 862
  • [29] NUCLEAR TEXTURE - CAN IT BE USED AS A SURROGATE END-POINT BIOMARKER
    PALCIC, B
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, : 40 - 46