DOSE SELECTION FOR TOXICITY STUDIES - A PROTOCOL FOR DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM REPEATABLE DOSE

被引:2
|
作者
SPURLING, NW
CAREY, PF
机构
[1] Development Division, Glaxo Group Research Ltd, Ware, Hertfordshire
来源
HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY | 1992年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1177/096032719201100603
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
1 A three-stage protocol is described for a dose-ranging study which defines the maximum repeatable dose (MRD) and provides a preview of the toxicology of new, pharmacologically active, substances before commencing the first formal regulatory toxicity studies, usually of 2 or 4 weeks duration. 2 Additionally, a range of toxicokinetic (TK) data relevant to protocol design for formal studies is generated. 3 Stage A is a dose incrementation process in which the MRD is provisionally determined and basic TK values generated. 4 In stage B the animals are dosed daily for at least 7 d, the MRD is substantiated and a wider range of TK data obtained. 5 In stage C, each of the dose levels identified for a formal study is administered once to investigate the relationship of doses to TK data. 6 This protocol can be completed using as few as 24 rats or six dogs (or primates). 7 Selection of dose levels for the first formal studies can be greatly aided by the results of a well-designed dose-ranging study including TK data. 8 For particularly toxic substances, the findings of studies based on this protocol have frequently been sufficiently clear to warrant early termination of their development.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 457
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determination of maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of Inauhzin in mice
    Zhang, Qi
    Zeng, Shelya X.
    Lu, Hua
    TOXICOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 2 : 546 - 554
  • [22] Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies
    Hanks, GE
    Hanlon, AL
    Pinover, WH
    Horwitz, EM
    Price, RA
    Schultheiss, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04): : 823 - 832
  • [23] A METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE FOR INVIVO CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS
    THOMPSON, ED
    HILES, RA
    FOOD AND COSMETICS TOXICOLOGY, 1981, 19 (03): : 347 - 351
  • [24] A METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE FOR INVIVO CYTOGENETICS ANALYSIS
    THOMPSON, ED
    GIBSON, DP
    ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1984, 6 (03): : 468 - 468
  • [25] Determining Field Insecticide Efficacy on Whiteflies with Maximum Dose Bioassays
    Cremonez, Paulo S. G.
    Perier, Jermaine D.
    Simmons, Alvin M.
    Riley, David G.
    INSECTS, 2023, 14 (06)
  • [26] An application of reinforced urn processes to determining maximum tolerated dose
    Mezzetti, Maura
    Muliere, Pietro
    Bulla, Paolo
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2007, 77 (07) : 740 - 747
  • [27] High dose selection in general toxicity studies for drug development: A pharmaceutical industry perspective
    Buckley, Lorrene A.
    Dorato, Michael A.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 54 (03) : 301 - 307
  • [28] Practical consequences of ECHA's advice on dose level selection for reproductive toxicity studies
    Lohmann, B.
    Fuhlrott, J.
    Rohrig, R.
    Weber, M.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 384 : S127 - S128
  • [29] Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: Approaches to dose selection
    Rhomberg, Lorenz R.
    Baetcke, Karl
    Blancato, Jerry
    Bus, James
    Cohen, Samuel
    Conolly, Rory
    Dixit, Rakesh
    Doe, John
    Ekelman, Karen
    Fenner-Crisp, Penny
    Harvey, Paul
    Hattis, Dale
    Jacobs, Abigail
    Jacobson-Kram, David
    Lewandowski, Tom
    Liteplo, Robert
    Pelkonen, Olavi
    Rice, Jerry
    Somers, Diana
    Turturro, Angelo
    West, Webster
    Olin, Stephen
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2007, 37 (09) : 729 - 837
  • [30] Extrapolation of Oligonucleotide Dose Levels Used in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies to Selection of Safe Starting Dose Levels in Human Clinical Trials
    Kornbrust, Doug
    NUCLEIC ACID THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 29 (03) : 123 - 125