Institutional investors, political connection and audit quality in Malaysia

被引:30
|
作者
Wahab, Effiezal [1 ,2 ]
Zain, Mazlina [3 ]
James, Kieran [4 ]
Haron, Hasnah [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Grad Sch Business, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Dept Accounting, Sch Management, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia
[3] Multimedia Univ, Fac Management, Cyberjaya, Malaysia
[4] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Accounting Econ & Finance, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
关键词
Investors; Malaysia; Auditor's fees; Political systems; Organizations;
D O I
10.1108/10309610910987501
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the audit pricing literature by examining whether institutional investors and political connection are associated with higher audit fees. Design/methodology/approach - Both descriptive and multivariate analyses are employed to address the research objectives. In addition, the authors use panel data to control for both heterocedasticity and contemporaneous correlations in each cross-section. Findings - Based on a panel analysis of 390 Malaysian firms from 1999 to 2003, a positive relationship between institutional ownership and audit fees is found, although the economic impact is minimal. Further, the authors find that audit fees are higher for politically connected firms. Research limitations/implications - A thorough examination on the role of political connection is much warranted to provide a better understanding on such connection influences the audit market. Originality/value - This paper provides an alternative view on the role of political connection, and on how they influence the audit market.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / +
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of regulatory enforcement style and audit firm remedial actions on Investors' perceptions of audit quality
    Huang, Xiaowen
    Ko, John C. W.
    Phang, Soon-Yeow
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2022, 26 (04) : 553 - 571
  • [42] Institutional quality, political risk and tourism
    Ghalia, Thaana
    Fidrmuc, Jan
    Samargandi, Nahla
    Sohag, Kazi
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 32
  • [43] Know thy neighbor: Political uncertainty and the informational advantage of local institutional investors
    Aabo, Tom
    Lee, Suin
    Pantzalis, Christos
    Park, Jung Chul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2020, 113
  • [44] Institutional Investors, Political Connections, and the Incidence of Regulatory Enforcement Against Corporate Fraud
    Wenfeng Wu
    Sofia A. Johan
    Oliver M. Rui
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 134 : 709 - 726
  • [45] Institutional Investors, Political Connections, and the Incidence of Regulatory Enforcement Against Corporate Fraud
    Wu, Wenfeng
    Johan, Sofia A.
    Rui, Oliver M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 134 (04) : 709 - 726
  • [46] ANTITRUST FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
    Rock, Edward B.
    Rubinfeld, Daniel L.
    [J]. ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (01) : 221 - 278
  • [47] IN PRAISE OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
    SEELY, M
    [J]. FORTUNE, 1985, 111 (08) : 167 - 168
  • [48] Institutional investors.
    Ferson, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE, 2002, 76 (02): : 196 - 199
  • [49] Active institutional investors
    Bodington, Jeff
    [J]. Independent Energy, 1993, 23 (02):
  • [50] ARE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS SPECULATORS
    POUND, J
    SHILLER, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 1987, 13 (03): : 46 - 52