A comparison of functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release

被引:18
|
作者
Savoie, Felix H., III [1 ]
Zunkiewicz, Mark [2 ]
Field, Larry D. [2 ]
Replogle, William H. [3 ]
O'Brien, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Tulane Inst Sports Med, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Mississippi Sports Med & Orthopaed Ctr, Jackson, MS USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
关键词
muscle atrophy; suprascapular nerve release; revision rotator cuff repair; atrophy;
D O I
10.2147/OAJSM.S113020
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study was designed to compare functional outcomes in patients undergoing revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears (retracted medial to the glenoid) with Goutallier Grade 4 atrophy and concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve to a similar group of patients with Grade 3 atrophy undergoing revision rotator cuff repair (RTCR) without nerve release. We hypothesized that patients undergoing nerve release would have more favorable functional outcomes as measured by the Modified University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA). Patients and methods: Twenty-two patients underwent revision repair of massive rotator cuff tears with release of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. We compared total preoperative, postoperative, and change in UCLA score in these patients to a similar group of 22 patients undergoing revision RTCR without suprascapular nerve release. Additionally, UCLA subscores between the two groups were compared preoperatively and at final follow-up. Results: The average preoperative UCLA score in the nerve-release group was 7.91, and final follow-up average was 27.86; average 3.05 grades of strength were recovered. In the comparison group, average preoperative UCLA score was 11.77, and final follow-up average was 29.09; average 1.32 grades of strength were recovered. The average preoperative UCLA score was significantly worse in the nerve-release group (P=0.007). The average postoperative UCLA score was not significantly different (P=0.590) between the groups, indicating a better improvement in the nerve-release group with significantly greater improvement in active forward flexion, strength, and pain relief. Conclusion: Patients who underwent concomitant release of the suprascapular nerve during revision RTCR had greater overall improvement as noted in pain relief, active forward flexion, and strength, than a comparable group without nerve release.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes After Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Krez, Alexandra N.
    Wu, Kevin A.
    Levin, Jay
    Crook, Bryan S.
    Anakwenze, Oke A.
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (06): : 1635 - 1640
  • [42] Functional outcomes after bilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Aleem, Alexander W.
    Syed, Usman Ali M.
    Wascher, Jocelyn
    Zoga, Adam C.
    Close, Koby
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    Cohen, Steven B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (10) : 1668 - 1673
  • [43] Suprascapular Nerve Block Is an Effective Pain Control Method in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kim, Jung Youn
    Kang, Min Wook
    Lee, Ho Won
    Noh, Kyu Cheol
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [44] Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Muscle Advancement and Artificial Biodegradable Sheet Reinforcement for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
    Yokoya, Shin
    Harada, Yohei
    Negi, Hiroshi
    Matsushita, Ryosuke
    Matsubara, Norimasa
    Adachi, Nobuo
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (10)
  • [45] Functional outcome following arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears is equal to smaller rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study
    Leow, Jun M.
    Krahelski, Oliver
    Keenan, Oisin J. F.
    Clement, Nicholas D.
    McBirnie, Julie M.
    [J]. SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2022, 14 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [46] Comparison of Outcomes between Open and Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Menekse, Serdar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 2024
  • [47] Arthroscopic in Situ Repair of Partial Bursal Rotator Cuff Tears Without Acromioplasty
    Ranalletta, Maximiliano
    Rossi, Luciano A.
    Atala, Nicolas A.
    Altieri, Bernardo A. B.
    Maignon, Gaston D.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (07): : 1294 - 1298
  • [48] Patch augmentation does not provide better clinical outcomes than arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for large to massive rotator cuff tears
    Choi, SeongJu
    Kim, Gotak
    Lee, Younghun
    Kim, Byung-Guk
    Jang, Inseok
    Kim, Jae Hwa
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2022, 30 (11) : 3851 - 3861
  • [49] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results in similar postoperative functional outcomes in patients with only rotator cuff tears and those with concomitant cervical radiculopathy
    Vikaesh Moorthy
    Jerry Yongqiang Chen
    Merrill Lee
    Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 : 2564 - 2569
  • [50] Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in a "Functional Biologic Augmentation" Technique to Treat Massive Atrophic Rotator Cuff Tears
    Pennington, William T.
    Chen, Steven W.
    Bartz, Brian A.
    Pennington, Joann M.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (05): : E465 - E472