Improved Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Field Junctions Using In Silico Base Plans: Application to Craniospinal Irradiation

被引:6
|
作者
McVicar, Nevin [1 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Inverse plan optimization; Treatment planning;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmir.2018.05.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Field junctions present a major challenge for planning craniospinal irradiation (CSI) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In this study, the feasibility of using in silico base dose distributions for planning junctioned VMAT fields for CSI is assessed. Methods: An in-house computer program was created to generate strategic base plans with controlled linear dose gradients across the junction. The algorithm was generalized to allow user-defined parameters such as number of junctions and junction length. In silico base plans were used to optimize junctioned VMAT CSI plans for a pediatric case and an adult case. Throughout optimization, dose to the eyes, kidneys, lungs, heart, and liver were minimized. Final plan quality was evaluated using the percent of planning target volume receiving at least 95% prescription dose (V-95%), homogeneity index, and conformity number. Final plan robustness to setup error was evaluated using changes in near-minimum, median, and near-maximum doses defined as the most exposed 98%, 50%, and 2% of the planning target volume (D-98%, D-50%, D-2%) within the junction region before and after setup errors of +/- 3, +/- 5, and +/- 7 mm in the craniocaudal direction. Results: The program generated ideal in silico dose distributions that were compatible with a commercial treatment planning system for use as base doses during VMAT optimization. VMAT plans, that were optimized with the in silico base plans, had complementary linear dose profiles across the junction. Final pediatric and adult VMAT CSI plans both had V-95% >= 98.1% and 98.1%, homogeneity index: 0.09 and 0.10, and conformity number: 0.86, 0.84, respectively. In addition, dose to surrounding organs at risk was acceptably low for both cases. For +/- 3 mm setup errors, small variations in the junction dose were recorded with Delta D-98% <= 2.3%, Delta D-50% <= 2.3%, and Delta D-2% <= 2.8%. Conclusions: This is the first demonstration of junctioned VMAT field optimization with a controlled linear dose gradient across the junction without the use of any extra planning contours. Planning junctioned VMAT using in silico base plans is feasible and capable of generating high-quality plans that are robust to clinically expected setup variations.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Implementation of Robust Multi-isocentric Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Craniospinal Irradiation
    Smyth, G.
    Mowat, S.
    Chia, K.
    Robinson, K.
    Warren-Oseni, K.
    Welsh, L. C.
    Blasiak-Wal, I
    Mandeville, H. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04) : 211 - 219
  • [32] Comparative dosimetric analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy based craniospinal irradiation plans between Halcyon ring gantry and TrueBeam C-arm linear accelerator
    Biplab Sarkar
    Subhra Snigdha Biswal
    Tanweer Shahid
    Tanmoy Ghosh
    Jibak Bhattacharya
    Arundhati De
    Mukti Mukherjee
    Tharmarnadar Ganesh
    Luca Cozzi
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [33] Comparative dosimetric analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy based craniospinal irradiation plans between Halcyon ring gantry and TrueBeam C-arm linear accelerator
    Sarkar, Biplab
    Biswal, Subhra Snigdha
    Shahid, Tanweer
    Ghosh, Tanmoy
    Bhattacharya, Jibak
    De, Arundhati
    Mukherjee, Mukti
    Ganesh, Tharmarnadar
    Cozzi, Luca
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [34] Improved Radiosurgery Treatment Planning Using Conformal Arc Informed Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Cullom, E.
    Adamson, J.
    Laryea, O.
    Kirkpatrick, J.
    Yin, F.
    Giles, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E369 - E370
  • [35] The determination of optimal treatment plans for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Dursun, Pinar
    Taskin, Z. Caner
    Altinel, I. Kuban
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 272 (01) : 372 - 388
  • [36] Comparison of RapidArc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Helical Tomotherapy, and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation
    Patel, S.
    Warkentin, H.
    Powell, K.
    Syme, A.
    Warkentin, B.
    Fallone, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S591 - S591
  • [37] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Craniospinal Irradiation Utilizing a Vertebral Body Sparing Approach: An Alternative Approach to Improve Access and Minimize
    Perlow, Haley K.
    Matsui, Jennifer K.
    Ewing, Ashlee
    Cadieux, Catherine
    Dibs, Khaled
    Upadhyay, Rituraj
    Blakaj, Dukagjin M.
    Beyer, Sasha J.
    Thomas, Evan M.
    Grecula, John C.
    Raval, Raju R.
    Palmer, Joshua D.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (03)
  • [38] Principles and Clinical Application of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Popple, R.
    Shepard, D.
    Yu, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3333 - +
  • [39] Impact of Multi-criteria Optimization on 6-MV Flattening FilterFree Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Craniospinal Irradiation
    Mohandass P.
    Khanna D.
    Selvaganapathi A.
    Nishaanth B.
    Saravanan C.
    Thiyagaraj T.
    Bhalla N.
    Puri A.
    Blessy M.
    [J]. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2020, 17 (06) : 386 - 393
  • [40] Experimental Verification of Robustness Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Craniospinal Irradiation
    Yu, J.
    Liao, L.
    Sahoo, N.
    Zhu, X.
    Gillin, M.
    Zhang, X.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3429 - 3430