DEVELOPMENT OF A LABOUR PAIN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

被引:1
|
作者
Yazbek, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
来源
关键词
labour pain; labour pain assessment; labour pain measurement;
D O I
10.25159/2520-5293/279
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Labour may impose severe pain, yet women experience the intensity of pain differently. The severity of labour pain is frequently underestimated by women, midwives and clinicians. Pain assessment is considered the key to labour pain measurement and a standardised instrument can assist with adequate management of labour pain. Although a variety of pain assessment/measurement tools were found by a search conducted between 2000 and 2010, the tool charts are detailed and require time to complete, they do not cover all aspects of labour, and they avoid quantifying and documentation of labour pain. Developing a new multidimensional labour pain assessment instrument could assist midwives and clinicians with labour pain control. Ethical permission was obtained from the university Faculty Academic Ethics Committee to develop a new labour pain assessment instrument. Six steps of Blackburn and Waite (2006: 134) guided development of the instrument that measures pain during the first stage of labour. This exploratory sequential mixed method study, using a qualitative and quantitative research design, described the development process of the new instrument. Four focus groups with four to six members comprising midwifery lecturers, midwives working in the private and public hospitals, midwives in private practice and obstetricians were conducted to develop the instrument. The instrument was thereafter given in two Delphi technique rounds to the most senior persons teaching Midwifery at all South African universities to verify the content and structure of the instrument. Data analysis of the focus groups followed the steps of data reduction, data display and verification as proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994: 428-444) and the mean ratings of the Likert scale as determined by the university was presented in tables. The trustworthiness and validity and reliability (truth value) of the instrument were supported by using multiple types of data to develop the instrument. The focus group members and Delphi experts expressed their enthusiasm and appraisement for a new labour pain assessment instrument. A sense of closure (saturation) was attained and the experts concluded that the instrument was ready to be tested.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 26
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEVELOPMENT OF A DISTANCE EDUCATION ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT
    HARRISON, PJ
    SABA, F
    SEEMAN, BJ
    MOLISE, G
    BEHM, R
    WILLIAMS, MD
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 39 (04): : 65 - 77
  • [22] Contributions of pain behavior assessment and pain assessment to the development of pain clinics
    Keefe, FJ
    Holzberg, AD
    Beaupre, PM
    PAIN TREATMENT CENTERS AT A CROSSROADS: A PRACTICAL AND CONCEPTUAL REAPPRAISAL, 1996, 7 : 79 - 100
  • [23] Physiotherapeutic assessment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Development of a standardized physiotherapeutic assessment instrument for interprofessional cooperation in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome
    Klotz, S. G. R.
    Ketels, G.
    Richardsen, B.
    Loewe, B.
    Bruenahl, C. A.
    SCHMERZ, 2018, 32 (03): : 188 - 194
  • [24] A new instrument for pain assessment in the immediate postoperative period
    Machata, A. M.
    Kabon, B.
    Willschke, H.
    Faessler, K.
    Gustorff, B.
    Marhofer, P.
    Curatolo, M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (04) : 392 - 398
  • [25] Chronic pain evaluation: A valid, standardized assessment instrument
    Barron, BA
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 13 (02) : 125 - 126
  • [26] Pain, comorbidities, and clinical decision-making: conceptualization, development, and pilot testing of the Pain in Aging, Educational Assessment of Need instrument
    Siaton, Bernadette C.
    Hogans, Beth B.
    Frey-Law, Laura A.
    Brown, Lana M.
    Herndon, Christopher M.
    Buenaver, Luis F.
    FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 5
  • [27] Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    Hirsch, Joshua A.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    Heavner, James E.
    Falco, Frank J. E.
    Diwan, Sudhir
    Boswell, Mark V.
    Candido, Kenneth D.
    Onyewu, Obi
    Zhu, Jie
    Sehgal, Nalini
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Benyamin, Ramsin M.
    Helm, Standiford, II
    Singh, Vijay
    Datta, Sukdeb
    Abdi, Salahadin
    Christo, Paul J.
    Hameed, Haroon
    Hameed, Mariam
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Pampati, Vidyasagar
    Racz, Gabor B.
    Raj, P. Prithvi
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2014, 17 (03) : E263 - E290
  • [28] Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument for Methodologic Quality Assessment of Nonrandomized Studies of Interventional Techniques
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    Hirsch, Joshua A.
    Heavner, James E.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    Benyamin, Ramsin M.
    Sehgal, Nalini
    Falco, Frank J. E.
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Onyewu, Obi
    Zhu, Jie
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Boswell, Mark V.
    Helm, Standiford, II
    Candido, Kenneth D.
    Diwan, Sudhir
    Simopoulos, Thomas T.
    Singh, Vijay
    Pampati, Vidyasagar
    Racz, Gabor B.
    Raj, P. Prithvi
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2014, 17 (03) : E291 - E317
  • [29] Development of the pain management outcomes expectations instrument.
    Davis, GC
    Hiemenz, ML
    White, TL
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1999, 42 (09): : S330 - S330
  • [30] Development and validation of a new instrument to measure social pain
    Stangier, Ulrich
    Schueller, Johanna
    Braehler, Elmar
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)