COMPARISON OF SALIVARY FLUORIDE CONCENTRATIONS AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF A BIOADHESIVE SLOW-RELEASE TABLET AND A CONVENTIONAL FLUORIDE TABLET

被引:22
|
作者
BOTTENBERG, P
CLEYMAET, R
DEMUYNCK, C
REMON, JP
COOMANS, D
SLOP, D
机构
[1] FREE UNIV BRUSSELS,DEPT PHARMACEUT CHEM,B-1050 BRUSSELS,BELGIUM
[2] FREE UNIV BRUSSELS,DEPT PROSTHET DENT,B-1050 BRUSSELS,BELGIUM
[3] STATE UNIV GHENT,PHARMACEUT TECHNOL LAB,B-9000 GENT,BELGIUM
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb05496.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The in-vitro and in-vivo fluoride release of bioadhesive, slow-release tablets prepared from a mixture of polyethylene glycol polymers, containing 0.1 mg of fluoride as NaF was studied, and their ability to sustain fluoride levels in saliva were compared with conventional fluoride tablets with the same fluoride content. In-vitro release experiments showed that the bioadhesive tablets needed 8 h to release all their fluoride compared with < 1 h for the conventional fluoride tablets. In-vivo, the bioadhesive tablets had a retention period of 6 h and could sustain a salivary fluoride level of more than 10-mu-m above the baseline for 7 h. The conventional fluoride tablets achieved a peak concentration of 0.5 mM directly after dissolution in the mouth, but the fluoride level could not be sustained for longer than 1 h. A good agreement was found between the in-vitro swelling behaviour of the bioadhesive tablets and their in-vitro and in-vivo release characteristics and their in-vivo retention time.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 686
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCE OF A GENERIC SLOW-RELEASE THEOPHYLLINE TABLET
    HENDELES, L
    BRETON, AL
    BEATY, R
    HARMAN, E
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1995, 15 (01): : 26 - 35
  • [22] Effect of fluoride slow-release glass devices on salivary and gingival crevicular fluid levels of fluoride: A pilot study
    Tatsi, Chrysoula
    Toumba, Kyriacos Jack
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 5 (06): : 620 - 626
  • [23] Insufficient evidence that slow-release fluoride devices reduce cariesQuestion: Are slow-release fluoride devices effective for caries prevention?
    Derek Richards
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2015, 16 (2) : 45 - 45
  • [24] A review of slow-release fluoride devices.
    Toumba K.J.
    Al-Ibrahim N.S.
    Curzon M.E.
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2009, 10 (3) : 175 - 182
  • [25] A SLOW-RELEASE FLUORIDE RESIN FOR REMOVABLE APPLIANCES
    RAWLS, HR
    CHRISTENSEN, LV
    WRIGHT, GM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 : 681 - 681
  • [26] Slow-release fluoride devices: a literature review
    Pessani, Juliano Pelim
    Al-Ibrahim, Nahla Saleh
    Rabelo Buzalap, Marilia Afonso
    Toumba, Kyriacos Jack
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2008, 16 (04) : 238 - 246
  • [27] Salivary fluoride concentrations following applications of bioadhesive tablets and mouthrinses
    Vivien-Castioni, N
    Gurny, R
    Baehni, P
    Kaltsatos, V
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2000, 49 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [28] IN-VITRO BIOADHESION OF A BUCCAL, MICONAZOLE SLOW-RELEASE TABLET
    BOUCKAERT, S
    REMON, JP
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 45 (06) : 504 - 507
  • [29] EFFECTS OF NIFEDIPINE SLOW-RELEASE TABLET ON CEREBRAL-CIRCULATION
    MIYAZAKI, M
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1988, 44 (03): : 485 - 492
  • [30] SLOW-RELEASE IRON TABLET AND GANGRENE OF MECKELS-DIVERTICULUM
    WALSH, PV
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1980, 34 (8-9): : 258 - 258