Fixed combinations in the management of hypertension: perspectives on lercanidipine - enalapril

被引:17
|
作者
Barrios, Vivencio [1 ]
Escobar, Carlos [2 ]
Echarri, Rocio [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Dept Cardiol, Ctra Colmenar Km 9-100, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Infanta Sofia, Dept Cardiol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Infanta Sofia, Dept Nephrol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; calcium channel blockers; combination therapy; hypertension; lercanidipine; enalapril;
D O I
10.2147/VHRM.S3421
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Although achieving blood pressure (BP) control is critical to improve cardiovascular prognosis in hypertensive patients, many of them fail to achieve BP goals. The majority of hypertensive patients need more than one antihypertensive agent to attain BP targets. Combination therapy is required when monotherapy fails to attain BP objectives and as a first-line treatment in certain situations, such as markedly elevated BP values, when lower targets are required in high or very high cardiovascular risk patients. The advantages of combination therapy are well documented, with an increased antihypertensive efficacy as a result of the simultaneous inhibition of different mechanisms of action and with a lesser incidence of adverse events, because of the possible compensatory responses and the lower doses used. Calcium channel blockers are effective drugs in the treatment of hypertension. The efficacy of lercanidipine has been evaluated in several noncomparative and in comparative studies showing a great efficacy with a good tolerability. On the other hand, the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system appears to be very beneficial in the treatment of patients with hypertension. Enalapril is an effective and well tolerated angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. Although there are several fixedcombination drugs, the combination lercanidipine plus enalapril appears to be one of the most promising therapies in the treatment of hypertension. The aim of this manuscript is to update the published data about the efficacy and safety of this fixed combination.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 853
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LERCANIDIPINE AND AMLODIPINE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION
    Alharf, A.
    Padmanabhan, S.
    Muir, S.
    Walters, M.
    Meredith, Xx
    McInnes, G. T.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 109 : 109 - 109
  • [32] INFLUENCE OF FIXED VERSUS FREE PHARMACOLOGICAL COMBINATIONS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION
    Rodilla Sala, E.
    Perez Lahiguera, F.
    Cardona Alos, J.
    Costa Munoz, J. A.
    Pascual Izuel, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 : E99 - E99
  • [33] The effect of lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril combination on blood pressure in treatment-naive patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension
    Rayner, Brian
    PRAGMATIC AND OBSERVATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 10 : 9 - 14
  • [34] Lercanidipine - A review of its efficacy in the management of hypertension
    Bang, LM
    Chapman, TM
    Goa, KL
    DRUGS, 2003, 63 (22) : 2449 - 2472
  • [35] The fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril: more than mere blood pressure reduction
    Rosei, Enrico Agabiti
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 : 1 - 2
  • [36] Zanipril((R)) (Enalapril/Lercanidipine): The antihypertensive Fixed Combination with reduced Side Effect Rate (1)
    Potuzak, Andrea
    JOURNAL FUR HYPERTONIE, 2013, 17 (04): : 172 - 172
  • [37] Fixed combinations for the treatment of arterial hypertension
    Yenes Moerbeck, Alejandro
    MEDWAVE, 2010, 10 (11):
  • [38] Fixed-dose combinations for hypertension
    Kishore, Sandeep P.
    Salam, Abdul
    Rodgers, Anthony
    Jaffe, Marc G.
    Frieden, Tom
    LANCET, 2018, 392 (10150): : 819 - 820
  • [39] Implication of the fixed combinations in the hypertension treatment
    Kobalava, Z. D.
    Kotovskaya, J. V.
    RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 6 (04) : 550 - 557
  • [40] Lercanidipine in hypertension
    Borghi, Claudio
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (03) : 173 - 182