Is correction for metallic artefacts mandatory in cardiac SPECT/CT imaging in the presence of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads?

被引:0
|
作者
Etemadi, Zahra [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ghafarian, Pardis [4 ,5 ]
Bitarafan-Rajabi, Ahmad [6 ]
Malek, Hadi [6 ]
Rahmim, Arman [7 ,8 ]
Ay, Mohammad Reza [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Namazi Teaching Hosp, Nucl Med & Mol Imaging Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Natl Res Inst TB & Lung Dis, Chron Resp Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Masih Daneshvari Hosp, PET CT & Cyclotron Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] Iran Univ Med Sci, Rajaei Cardiovasc Med & Res Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Cardiovasc Intervent Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 2018年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Cardiac SPECT/CT; Metal artifact reduction; Virtual sonogram; Pacemaker; ICD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Metallic artifacts due to pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads in CT images can produce artifactual uptake in cardiac SPECT/CT images. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the metallic artifacts due to pacemaker and ICD leads on myocardial SPECT/CT imaging. Methods: The study included 9 patients who underwent myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). A cardiac phantom with an inserted solid defect was used. The SPECT images were corrected for attenuation using both artifactual CT and CT corrected using metal artifact reduction (MAR). VOI-based analysis was performed in artifactual regions. Results: In phantom studies, mean-of-relative-difference in white-region, between artifact-free attenuation-map without/with MAR were changed from 9.2 and 2.1 to 3.7 and 1.2 for ICD and pacemaker lead, respectively. However, these values for typical patient were 9.7 +/- 7.0 and 3.8 +/- 2.4 for ICD and pacemaker leads respectively, in white-region. MAR effectively reduces the artifacts in white-regions while this reduction is not significant in black-regions. Conclusion: Following application of MAR, visual and quantification analyses revealed that while quality of CT images were significantly improved, the improvements in the SPECT/CT images were not as pronounced or significant. Therefore cardiac SPECT images corrected for attenuation using CT in the presence of metallic-leads can be interpreted without correction for metal artefacts.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is metal artefact reduction mandatory in cardiac PET/CT imaging in the presence of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads?
    Pardis Ghafarian
    S. M. R. Aghamiri
    Mohammad R. Ay
    Arman Rahmim
    Thomas H. Schindler
    Osman Ratib
    Habib Zaidi
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011, 38 : 252 - 262
  • [2] Is metal artefact reduction mandatory in cardiac PET/CT imaging in the presence of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads?
    Ghafarian, Pardis
    Aghamiri, S. M. R.
    Ay, Mohammad R.
    Rahmim, Arman
    Schindler, Thomas H.
    Ratib, Osman
    Zaidi, Habib
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (02) : 252 - 262
  • [3] Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads
    Kantharia, BK
    Kutalek, SP
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 14 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [4] Removal of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads
    Siebel, A.
    Mandewirth, M.
    Heinz, N.
    Diegeler, A.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2015, 29 (06): : 364 - 369
  • [5] Effects of Pacemaker, Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, and Left Ventricular Leads on CT-Based Attenuation Correction
    Suzuki, Akira
    Koshida, Kichiro
    Matsubara, Kosuke
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 42 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [6] Comparison between percutaneous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads and pacemaker leads
    Klug, D.
    Marquie, C.
    Brigadeau, F.
    Guedon, L.
    Kouakam, C.
    Lacroix, D.
    Kacet, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 397 - 397
  • [7] Pacemaker, cardiac resynchonisation, implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, event monitoring
    Klein, N.
    Klein, M.
    Pfeiffer, D.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 138 (49) : 2526 - 2529
  • [8] PERCUTANEOUS EXTRACTION OF CARDIAC PACEMAKER AND IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR LEADS WITH A NEW TOOL; A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Oto, Ali
    Aytemir, Kudret
    Kabakci, Giray
    Yorgun, Hikmet
    Canpolat, Ugur
    Kaya, Ergun Baris
    Ates, Ahmet Hakan
    Dural, Muhammet
    Sunman, Hamza
    Evranos, Banu
    Ulgen, Aysegul
    Ozkutlu, Hilmi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 140 : S83 - S83
  • [9] Proximity of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads to Coronary Arteries as Assessed by Cardiac Computed Tomography
    Pang, Benjamin J.
    Joshi, Subodh B.
    Lui, Elaine H.
    Tacey, Mark A.
    Alison, Jeff
    Seneviratne, Sujith K.
    Cameron, James D.
    Mond, Harry G.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (06): : 717 - 723
  • [10] Should unipolar pacemaker leads be banned? Lessons from pacemaker implantable cardioverter defibrillator interactions
    Weiss, DN
    Zilo, P
    Luceri, RM
    Habal, SM
    David, IB
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (02): : 237 - 239