Sign Languages in the Context of Heritage Language: A New Direction in Language Research

被引:5
|
作者
Polinsky, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Linguist, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] HSE, Linguist, Moscow, Russia
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sls.2018.0009
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
A heritage language is defined as a minority language that differs from the dominant language used in a particular community. Codas (children of Deaf adults) who sign but may be dominant in the spoken language of their community present an interesting case due to the added difference of a spoken/signed modality in their linguistic repertoire. The relatively new field of research on heritage sign languages builds on our knowledge of the phenomena at play when both the heritage language (HL) and the community language use a spoken modality (e.g., varying degrees of proficiency in the HL, interference by the community language on the HL). It also addresses issues specific to bilinguals who balance their use of signed and spoken language by blending, for example (i.e., they simultaneously sign and speak rather than code-switch). One crucial aspect of the study of heritage language is the assessment of its production. This can be carried out by using cloze tests or eliciting narratives (using picture books or silent video clips as prompts) and then determining the rate of speech or the number of errors. Methods are also being developed to assess comprehension and perception in signed languages. The study of heritage sign languages promises to provide new insights into strong tendencies already established in heritage spoken languages (e.g., speakers' difficulty with optionality and ambiguity; speakers' command of verbs in their heritage language, which exceeds their grasp of nouns).
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 428
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Heritage and community languages in the national language debate
    Wiley, Terrence G.
    [J]. MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2007, 91 (02): : 252 - 255
  • [22] Language Planning and Policies for Sign Languages Foreword
    Quer, Josep
    de Quadros, Ronice M.
    [J]. SIGN LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2012, 12 (04) : 465 - 466
  • [23] Compounds in sign languages The case of Italian and French Sign Language
    Santoro, Mirko
    [J]. SIGN LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS, 2019, 22 (02) : 291 - 297
  • [24] Historical observations on the relationship between research on sign languages and language origins theory
    Kendon, A
    [J]. STUDY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF WILLIAM C. STOKOE, 2002, : 35 - 52
  • [25] Sign language interpreter in the university context
    Munoz Vilugron, Karina
    Sanchez Bravo, Alejandra
    Herreros Roa, Barbara
    [J]. RELIGACION-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y HUMANIDADES, 2018, 3 (10): : 159 - 173
  • [26] New sign language new(S): the globalization of sign language in the smartphone era
    Tannenbaum-Baruchi, Carolina
    Feder-Bubis, Paula
    [J]. DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2018, 33 (02) : 309 - 312
  • [27] Learning a new language (Identifier of sign language)
    Campos Torres, Isaias
    Garrido Leon, Jose Francisco
    Cobos Martinez, Mario
    [J]. 2017 IEEE MEXICAN HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (MHTC), 2017, : 64 - 69
  • [28] The highlights of research on sign language interpretation in the academic context of community interpretation
    Metzger, Melanie
    [J]. CADERNOS DE TRADUCAO, 2010, 26 (02): : 13 - 62
  • [29] A roadmap for heritage language research
    Polinsky, Maria
    Scontras, Gregory
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2020, 23 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [30] Persistence and transmission of recessive deafness and sign language: new insights from village sign languages
    Gialluisi, Alessandro
    Dediu, Dan
    Francks, Clyde
    Fisher, Simon E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2013, 21 (09) : 894 - 896