PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE AND STANDARD-DOSE ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH EXTENSIVE-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER

被引:220
|
作者
IHDE, DC
MULSHINE, JL
KRAMER, BS
STEINBERG, SM
LINNOILA, RI
GAZDAR, AF
EDISON, M
PHELPS, RM
LESAR, M
PHARES, JC
GRAYSON, J
MINNA, JD
JOHNSON, BE
机构
[1] NCI, USN, MED ONCOL BRANCH, RADIAT ONCOL BRANCH, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, BIOSTAT & DATA MANAGEMENT SECT, BETHESDA, MD USA
[3] NATL NAVAL MED CTR, DEPT MED, BETHESDA, MD USA
[4] UNIFORMED SERV UNIV HLTH SCI, DEPT RADIOL, BETHESDA, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We performed a prospective randomized clinical trial to determine whether higher doses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) yield more complete responses or longer survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Patients and Methods: Ninety patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC: fulfilled criteria for randomization to standard dose versus high-dose EP. Another 25 patients at risk of excessive toxicity from high-dose treatment were given standard-dose therapy. During cycles 1 and 2 of EP, patients on standard-dose treatment received intravenous etoposide 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks; high-dose treatment consisted of etoposide 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 and cisplatin 27 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 every 3 weeks. All patients received standard-dose EP in cycles 3 and 4. In cycles 5 through 8, completely responding patients continued standard-dose EP; all other patients received either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine, or (if possible) a combination drug program based on in vitro drug sensitivity testing of tumor-cell lines established from individual patients. Results: Despite 68% higher doses and a 46% higher dose-rate intensity actually given to patients randomized to receive high-dose relative to chose randomised to receive standard-dose EP, complete response rates (23% v 22%; P = .99) and median survival durations (10.7 and 11.4 months, respectively; P = .68) were virtually identical. Complete responses occurred in 4% of patients and the median survival duration was 5.8 months in nonrandomized patients. Leukopenia (P < .0001), thrombocytopenia (P < .0001), febrile neutropenia (P = .01), and weight loss (P = .02) were significantly more common in patients randomized to receive high-dose compared with standard-dose EP. Conclusion: No therapeutic benefits resulted from increasing planned doses by 67% for the first two cycles of EP in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. Higher doses were associated with substantially worse toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:2022 / 2034
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combination Chemotherapy of Alternating Etoposide and Carboplatin with Weekly Administration of Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer
    Yoshimura, Akinobu
    Noro, Rintaro
    Miyanaga, Akihiko
    Mizutani, Hideaki
    Kosaihira, Seiji
    Minegishi, Yuji
    Seike, Masahiro
    Hino, Mitsunori
    Ando, Masahiro
    Nomura, Koichiro
    Okano, Tetsuya
    Kobayashi, Kunihiko
    Gemma, Akihiko
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (10) : 4473 - 4478
  • [32] A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, DOXORUBICIN, AND VINCRISTINE FOR EXTENSIVE-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - A PHASE-III TRIAL OF THE SOUTHEASTERN-CANCER-STUDY-GROUP
    JOHNSON, DH
    EINHORN, LH
    BIRCH, R
    VOLLMER, R
    PEREZ, C
    KRAUSS, S
    OMURA, G
    GRECO, FA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (11) : 1731 - 1738
  • [33] Mathematical optimisation of the cisplatin plus etoposide combination for managing extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients
    Faivre, C.
    El Cheikh, R.
    Barbolosi, D.
    Barlesi, F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 116 (03) : 344 - 348
  • [34] Chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC):: A randomized trial of high-dose epirubicin-cisplatin (HDEP) versus etoposide-cisplatin (EP).
    Gómez-Codina, J
    Artal, A
    González-Larriba, JL
    Campbell, J
    Barneto, I
    Carrato, A
    Isla, D
    Camps, C
    García-Girón, C
    Font, A
    Meana, A
    Lomas, M
    Vadell, C
    Arrivi, A
    Alonso, C
    Maestu, I
    Rosell, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S63 - S63
  • [35] Influence of tumor response on the survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with the etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy regimen
    Guojing Zhang
    Yongye Liu
    Chao Lin
    Jianfei Guo
    Long Xu
    Junling Liu
    Ying Piao
    Guanzhong Zhang
    Yuhui Liu
    Yaling Han
    Xiaodong Xie
    OncologyandTranslationalMedicine, 2015, 1 (02) : 65 - 68
  • [36] PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH EXTENSIVE-STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    GRECO, FA
    HAINSWORTH, JD
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1994, 21 (04) : 3 - 6
  • [37] CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ETOPOSIDE, AND CISPLATIN INDUCTION THERAPY FOR SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - DOSE INTENSIFICATION
    JOHNSON, DH
    MANGUM, MD
    GRECO, FA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1987, 35 (01): : A26 - A26
  • [38] THE ROLE OF STANDARD-DOSE ETOPOSIDE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NONSMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER
    RUCKDESCHEL, JC
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1992, 19 (06) : 39 - 44
  • [39] PROLONGED ADMINISTRATION OF ORAL ETOPOSIDE PLUS CISPLATIN IN EXTENSIVE STAGE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    GRECO, FA
    MURPHY, PB
    HAINSWORTH, JD
    HANDE, KR
    JOHNSON, DH
    MASUDA, N
    FURUSE, K
    ONCOLOGY, 1992, 49 : 34 - 39
  • [40] RANDOMIZED PHASE-II TRIAL OF HIGH-DOSE 4'-EPIDOXORUBICIN + CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE 4'-EPIDOXORUBICIN + CISPLATIN IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED PATIENTS WITH EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    KANITZ, E
    KOLARIC, K
    JASSEM, J
    MECHL, Z
    PAWLICKI, M
    RINGWALD, G
    ROLSKI, J
    SCHOKET, Z
    VUKAS, D
    KAPLAN, E
    ECKHARDT, S
    ONCOLOGY, 1992, 49 (05) : 327 - 332