Efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia

被引:26
|
作者
Ismail, Farhana [1 ]
Majid, M. [2 ]
Rahim, Rossazana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Econ, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
[2] Syiah Kuala Univ, Fac Econ, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
关键词
Efficiency; DEA; Tobit; Islamic; Banking; Malaysia;
D O I
10.1108/JFRA-03-2013-0011
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The main purpose of this paper is to examine cost efficiencies of the selected Islamic and conventional commercial banks over the period of 2006 to 2009 in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach - Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was initially used, to investigate the cost efficiency of the Malaysian banking sector and followed by Tobit regression analysis determine factors influencing the efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia. Findings - The DEA results reveal technical efficiency as the main contributor of cost efficiency for conventional commercial banks and allocative efficiency as the main contributor for cost efficiency of Islamic commercial banks. This indicates conventional commercial banks have been efficient in utilizing information technology and electronics. Islamic commercial banks conversely have been efficient in allocating and utilizing their resources. Additionally, scale efficiency is found to be the main source of technical efficiency for both Islamic and conventional commercial banks, denoting that size is important in improving bank efficiency. The results of Tobit regression analysis are twofold. First, it documents capitalization and bank sizes are positively and significantly associated to efficiency. Secondly, loan quality is found to be negatively and significantly associated to efficiency. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the body of knowledge through its literature discussions on the efficiency of both Islamic and conventional banks and the effect of banks' specific characteristics on their efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 107
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Technology Gap and Managerial Efficiency: A Comparison between Islamic and Conventional Banks in MENA
    Mohamed Chaffai
    M. Kabir Hassan
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2019, 51 : 39 - 53
  • [32] Technology Gap and Managerial Efficiency: A Comparison between Islamic and Conventional Banks in MENA
    Chaffai, Mohamed
    Hassan, M. Kabir
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2019, 51 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [33] EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN SAUDI ARABIA: AN EMPIRICAL AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Khan, Muhammad Nauman
    Bin Amin, Md Fouad
    Khokhar, Imran
    ul Hassan, Mehboob
    Ahmad, Khaliq
    AL-SHAJARAH, 2018, : 111 - 134
  • [34] A Survival Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks
    Vasileios Pappas
    Steven Ongena
    Marwan Izzeldin
    Ana-Maria Fuertes
    Journal of Financial Services Research, 2017, 51 : 221 - 256
  • [35] Productivity, technology and efficiency of de Novo Islamic banks: Empirical evidence from Malaysia
    Sufian F.
    Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2010, 15 (3) : 241 - 258
  • [36] Islamic and Conventional Banks Stability in Indonesia
    Khan, Shabeer
    Aziza, Nur Amalia
    Nawaz, Allah Ditta
    ETIKONOMI, 2024, 23 (01): : 167 - 182
  • [37] A Survival Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks
    Pappas, Vasileios
    Ongena, Steven
    Izzeldin, Marwan
    Fuertes, Ana-Maria
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (02) : 221 - 256
  • [38] ISLAMIC BANKING AS ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL BANKS?
    Palickova, Irena
    KNOWLEDGE FOR MARKET USE 2014: MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2014, : 245 - 254
  • [39] Stock returns in Islamic and conventional banks
    Monia, Ben Ltaifa
    JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (03) : 629 - 646
  • [40] On the role of Islamic and conventional banks in the monetary policy transmission in Malaysia: Do size and liquidity matter?
    Rashid, Abdul
    Hassan, M. Kabir
    Shah, Muhammad Abdul Rehman
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52