Tax incentives for bond-oriented individual investors: evidence from the Russian Federation

被引:3
|
作者
Belomyttseva, Olga S. [1 ,3 ]
Grinkevich, Larisa S. [1 ,3 ]
Grinkevich, Anastasiia M. [1 ,4 ]
Bobek, Samo [2 ,5 ]
Tominc, Polona [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Tomsk State Univ, Tomsk, Russia
[2] Univ Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
[3] Natl Res Tomsk State Univ, Finance & Accounting Dept, 36 Lenin St, Tomsk 634036, Russia
[4] Natl Res Tomsk State Univ, Econ Dept, Tomsk 634036, Russia
[5] Univ Maribor, E Business Dept, 14 Razlagov St, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
[6] Univ Maribor, Dept Quantitat Econ Anal, 14 Razlagov St, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
来源
JOURNAL OF TAX REFORM | 2018年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
Bond; coupon; individual income tax; tax relief; investment tax deduction; individual investment account; long-term securities holding; financial marketplace;
D O I
10.15826/jtr.2018.4.2.047
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The paper addresses the specificities of tax incentives in the form of tax reliefs designated for individual investors, who invest in bonds in the Russian Federation. The need for the use of tax incentives to encourage individual investors to purchase bonds is regarded as an integral aspect of the bondization, announced by the Bank of Russia. The objective of this paper is to analyze the specific features of the investment tax relief implementation in the Russian Federation and to reveal issues that remain controversial and require particularization. It was found that stimulation of investment through tax is widely studied by foreign scientists; however, it is almost completely disregarded in Russia. The following tax innovations related to investments of individual Russian investors were analyzed: tax relief for coupon income, derived from corporate bonds; investment tax deductions (individual investment account and long-term capital gains exemption); long-term capital gains exemption for securities of the high-tech (innovation) sector of economy. Reconciliation schemes for the above-mentioned reliefs were identified. Insufficiency of quantitative data for the effectiveness evaluation of tax relief for individual investors was revealed, which was explained by the short validity period of this relief. The authors proved the absence of a uniform system tax relief instruments for individual investors and found that bond holders have more tax relief options, compared to share holders of other investment instruments. In this context, it was proposed to make amendments to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in order to ensure tax equalization with relation to derivative instruments, designed on the basis of bonds, mutual fund units). In addition, it was recommended to adjust a number of technical aspects, connected with tax relief application and to evaluate the effectiveness of the reliefs under study.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 124
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tax incentives and the location of FDI: Evidence from a panel of German multinationals
    Buettner, Thiess
    Ruf, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2007, 14 (02) : 151 - 164
  • [42] Impact of Tax Incentives on Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Africa
    Appiah-Kubi, Seth Nana Kwame
    Malec, Karel
    Phiri, Joseph
    Maitah, Mansoor
    Gebeltova, Zdenka
    Smutka, Lubos
    Blazek, Vojtech
    Maitah, Kamil
    Sirohi, Jitka
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [43] The Impact of Investment Incentives: Evidence from UK Corporation Tax Returns
    Maffini, Giorgia
    Xing, Jing
    Devereux, Michael P.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 11 (03) : 361 - 389
  • [44] Tax Incentives as a Solution to the Uninsured: Evidence from the Self-Employed
    Gumus, Gulcin
    Regan, Tracy L.
    [J]. INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2013, 50 (04) : 275 - 295
  • [45] Tax and Nontax Incentives in Income Shifting: Evidence from Shadow Insurers
    Hepfer, Bradford F.
    Wilde, Jaron H.
    Wilson, Ryan J.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 95 (04): : 219 - 262
  • [46] Tax Incentives and Charitable Contributions: the Evidence from Censored Quantile Regression
    Lin, Hsin-Yi
    Lo, Kuang-Ta
    [J]. PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 17 (04) : 535 - 558
  • [47] Temporary investment tax incentives: Theory with evidence from bonus depreciation
    House, Christopher L.
    Shapiro, Matthew D.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (03): : 737 - 768
  • [48] Investment Performance of Individual Investors: Evidence from the Korean Stock Market
    Park, Jinwoo
    Kim, Minhyuk
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2014, 50 : 194 - 211
  • [49] The impact of standard setting on individual investors: evidence from SFAS 109
    Michelle Hutchens
    Sonja O. Rego
    Brian Williams
    [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2024, 29 : 1407 - 1455
  • [50] The impact of standard setting on individual investors: evidence from SFAS 109
    Hutchens, Michelle
    Rego, Sonja O.
    Williams, Brian
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2024, 29 (02) : 1407 - 1455