GENERAL-ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL OFFERS NO ADVANTAGE IN EARLY RECOVERY TO HALOTHANE AND MIDAZOLAM FENTANYL AFTER COLON SURGERY WITH EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA

被引:4
|
作者
EBERHART, LHJ
KUMM, M
SEELING, W
机构
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 1994年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL; GENERAL; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.1007/s001010050044
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Early mental and psychomotor recovery was studied in 67 patients undergoing colorectal surgery under continuous epidural anaesthesia and light general anaesthesia using propofol, halothane, and midazolam/fentanyl. The study was approved by the local ethics commitee. All patients received epidural anaesthesia with 0.25 % bupivacaine and were then randomly allocated to one of three groups. In group I (halothane), light general anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5mg/kg and maintained with halothane. The propofol group (II) received 2mg/kg for induction and a mean continuous infusion of 1.7mg/kg.h. In group III (Mi/Fe), midazolam and fentanyl were used for induction and maintenance. All patients were intubated, received non-depolarising muscle relaxants, and were manually ventilated with nitrous oxide-oxygen (2:1.2). For postoperative analgesia, 0.05mg/kg morphine was administrated epidurally 30 min before the end of the operation; 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after arriving in the recovery room, vigilance was assessed using a modified Steward score, the Trieger test, the ability to recall a column of numbers (KAI test), and symbol counting (CI test). Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and blood gases were recorded. Results. The three groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, ASA classification, and duration of anaesthesia and operation (Table 3). There was no difference between the groups in performance of the recovery tests (Figs. 2-5), blood pressure, heart rate, arterial blood gas analysis (Fig. 6), or oxygen saturation. Comparing pre- and postoperative values, we found severe psychomotor and mental impairment in all groups. PCO2 was slightly elevated in all groups, but only 3 patients in the propofol group and 6 in the midazolam/fentanyl group developed hypercapnia above 50 mm Hg. Patients receiving propofol or midazolam/fentanyl had significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting than those receiving halothane (Table 5). Conclusion. it is concluded that propofol offers no advantage over halothane or midazolam/fentanyl where early postoperative recovery is concerned. Intraoperatively, all three techniques provided good anaesthesia. Propofol and midazolam/fentanyl caused less postoperative nausea and vomiting than halothane anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RECOVERY OF MENTAL AND PSYCHOMOTOR-SKILLS FOLLOWING GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON OF ISOFLURANE, MIDAZOLAM ALFENTANIL AND PROPOFOL
    MOTSCH, J
    BREITBARTH, J
    SALZMANN, R
    BACH, A
    MARTIN, E
    ANAESTHESIST, 1992, 41 (04): : 185 - 191
  • [32] EFFECT OF THORACIC EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA COMBINED WITH GENERAL-ANESTHESIA ON SEGMENTAL WALL MOTION ASSESSED BY TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    SAADA, M
    CATOIRE, P
    BONNET, F
    DELAUNAY, L
    GORMEZANO, G
    MACQUINMAVIER, I
    BRUN, P
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 75 (03): : 329 - 335
  • [33] PARAPLEGIA AFTER EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR VASCULAR-SURGERY
    GAUDIN, P
    LEFANT, D
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1991, 10 (05): : 468 - 471
  • [34] GENERAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IN PRIMARY CESAREAN-SECTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    KRAUS, H
    DICK, W
    TRAUB, E
    TOLLNER, U
    BURGHARD, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND PERINATOLOGIE, 1983, 187 (04): : 194 - 199
  • [35] COMBINED EPIDURAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL-ANESTHESIA FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC-SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    DAVIES, MJ
    SILBERT, BS
    MOONEY, PJ
    DYSART, RH
    MEADS, AC
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1993, 21 (06) : 790 - 794
  • [36] POSTOPERATIVE LYMPHOCYTOPENIA AND LEUKOCYTOSIS AFTER EPIDURAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA
    JAKOBSEN, BW
    PEDERSEN, J
    EGEBERG, BB
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 30 (08) : 668 - 671
  • [37] COGNITIVE EFFECTS AFTER EPIDURAL VS GENERAL-ANESTHESIA
    WITT, WO
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (19): : 1510 - 1510
  • [38] FLUMAZENIL FOR POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY AFTER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA
    WOLFF, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, : 239 - 249
  • [39] REGIONAL VERSUS PROPOFOL GENERAL-ANESTHESIA FOR OUTPATIENT HAND SURGERY
    ALLEN, HW
    MULROY, MF
    FUNDIS, K
    CARPENTER, RL
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (3A) : A1 - A1
  • [40] COMBINATION OF EPIDURAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA IN THORACO-ABDOMINAL SURGERY
    KLOSS, T
    HEMPEL, V
    JUNGINGER, W
    KELLER, G
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1982, 358 : 491 - 491