GENERAL-ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL OFFERS NO ADVANTAGE IN EARLY RECOVERY TO HALOTHANE AND MIDAZOLAM FENTANYL AFTER COLON SURGERY WITH EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA

被引:4
|
作者
EBERHART, LHJ
KUMM, M
SEELING, W
机构
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 1994年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
ANESTHESIA RECOVERY PERIOD; ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL; GENERAL; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.1007/s001010050044
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Early mental and psychomotor recovery was studied in 67 patients undergoing colorectal surgery under continuous epidural anaesthesia and light general anaesthesia using propofol, halothane, and midazolam/fentanyl. The study was approved by the local ethics commitee. All patients received epidural anaesthesia with 0.25 % bupivacaine and were then randomly allocated to one of three groups. In group I (halothane), light general anaesthesia was induced with thiopental 3-5mg/kg and maintained with halothane. The propofol group (II) received 2mg/kg for induction and a mean continuous infusion of 1.7mg/kg.h. In group III (Mi/Fe), midazolam and fentanyl were used for induction and maintenance. All patients were intubated, received non-depolarising muscle relaxants, and were manually ventilated with nitrous oxide-oxygen (2:1.2). For postoperative analgesia, 0.05mg/kg morphine was administrated epidurally 30 min before the end of the operation; 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after arriving in the recovery room, vigilance was assessed using a modified Steward score, the Trieger test, the ability to recall a column of numbers (KAI test), and symbol counting (CI test). Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and blood gases were recorded. Results. The three groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, ASA classification, and duration of anaesthesia and operation (Table 3). There was no difference between the groups in performance of the recovery tests (Figs. 2-5), blood pressure, heart rate, arterial blood gas analysis (Fig. 6), or oxygen saturation. Comparing pre- and postoperative values, we found severe psychomotor and mental impairment in all groups. PCO2 was slightly elevated in all groups, but only 3 patients in the propofol group and 6 in the midazolam/fentanyl group developed hypercapnia above 50 mm Hg. Patients receiving propofol or midazolam/fentanyl had significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting than those receiving halothane (Table 5). Conclusion. it is concluded that propofol offers no advantage over halothane or midazolam/fentanyl where early postoperative recovery is concerned. Intraoperatively, all three techniques provided good anaesthesia. Propofol and midazolam/fentanyl caused less postoperative nausea and vomiting than halothane anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA IN OBSTETRIC SURGERY
    ALBRECHT, H
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1991, 250 (1-4) : 793 - 795
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA, GENERAL-ANESTHESIA, AND COMBINED EPIDURAL GENERAL-ANESTHESIA FOR RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    MALHOTRA, V
    STOUT, R
    GIRARDI, SC
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (3A) : A973 - A973
  • [3] RECOVERY AFTER PROPOFOL, MIDAZOLAM, AND METHOHEXITONE AS AN ADJUNCT TO EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL-SURGERY
    ATANASSOFF, PG
    ALON, E
    PASCH, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 10 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [4] MONOCYTE FUNCTIONS ARE DEPRESSED DURING AND AFTER SURGERY UNDER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA BUT NOT UNDER EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA
    HOLE, A
    UNSGAARD, G
    BREIVIK, H
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 26 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [5] REDISTRIBUTION OF BODY HEAT DURING ANESTHESIA - COMPARISON OF HALOTHANE, FENTANYL AND EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA
    HOLDCROFT, A
    HALL, GM
    COOPER, GM
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1979, 34 (08) : 758 - 764
  • [6] HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF GENERAL-ANESTHESIA INDUCTION DURING THORACIC EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA
    VIGUE, B
    PROBST, D
    MINOZ, O
    KUHLMAN, L
    SAMII, K
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1991, 10 (03): : 225 - 229
  • [7] EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA AS AN ADJUNCT TO GENERAL-ANESTHESIA DOES NOT IMPROVE OUTCOME IN AORTIC RECONSTRUCTION
    GOTTLIEB, A
    SANGA, R
    WHALLEY, D
    RYCKMAN, J
    ESFANDIARI, S
    SCHOENWALD, P
    MEKHAIL, NA
    STANTONHICKS, M
    LEWIS, B
    POPOVICH, M
    BEDOCS, NM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (3A) : A63 - A63
  • [8] COMBINED EPIDURAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL-ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS HAVING COLON AND RECTAL ANASTOMOSES
    RYAN, P
    SCHWEITZER, S
    COLLOPY, B
    TAYLOR, D
    [J]. ACTA CHIRURGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, : 146 - 151
  • [9] COMBINED EPIDURAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL-ANESTHESIA FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC-SURGERY
    BARON, JF
    BERTRAND, M
    BARRE, E
    GODET, G
    MUNDLER, O
    CORIAT, P
    VIARS, P
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 75 (04) : 611 - 618
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF FENTANYL AND HALOTHANE SUPPLEMENTATION TO GENERAL-ANESTHESIA ON THE STRESS RESPONSE IN ABDOMINAL-SURGERY
    CAMPBELL, BC
    NAISMITH, A
    PARIKH, RK
    REID, JL
    SEWNAUTH, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 13 (04) : P604 - P604