Comparative study between dexmedetomidine-ketamine and fentanyl-ketamine combinations for sedation in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. A randomized double blinded study

被引:4
|
作者
El sayed, Ayman A. [1 ]
Assad, Osama M. [2 ]
El tahawy, Mohamad S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Cairo, Cairo Governora, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Fac Med, Giza, Giza Governorat, Egypt
关键词
ESWL; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl and Ketamine;
D O I
10.1016/j.egja.2014.11.001
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objectives Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is used safely for management of urinary stones. The aim of this randomized double blinded study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine-ketamine and fentanyl-ketamine combinations on analgesia, sedation, hemodynamics and respiratory effects in patients underwent ESWL. Methods: Sixty patients aged between 20 and 50 years, ASA I or II physical status were randomly assigned into two groups. In Group Fentanyl-ketamine (FK) (n= 27): Patients received fentanyl at a 1 mu g/kg over 10 min before the procedure and 0.5 mg/kg bolus of ketamine. In Group Dexmedetomidine-ketamine DK (n= 30): patients received dexmedetomidine 1 mu g/kg over 10 min before the procedure and a 0.5 mg/kg bolus of ketamine. A blinded researcher assessed the patient's pain level (primary outcome), sedation level, and awareness via visual analogue scale (VAS), modified Observer's Assessment Alertness/sedation, and bispectral index respectively. Results: There was a significant increase in VAS in the recovery period in FK group. There was a significant decrease in hemodynamics (HR, MAP) in the recovery period in DK group. There was a significant increase in bispectral index values in FK group during the postoperative period. The first analgesia required was significantly longer in DK. There was a significant increase in sedation score in the recovery period in FK group. There was no significant difference between the two groups as regards the adverse effects except nausea and vomiting (significant in FK group). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine/ketamine combination was accompanied by more prolonged analgesia in the recovery period, prolonged sedation, and delayed request of first dose analgesia with less nausea and vomiting than fentanyl/ketamine combination. (C) 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Egyptian Society of Anesthesiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 41
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study
    Koruk, Senem
    Mizrak, Ayse
    Gul, Rauf
    Kilic, Ertugrul
    Yendi, Fatih
    Oner, Unsal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2010, 24 (06) : 858 - 863
  • [2] Dexmedetomidine–ketamine and midazolam–ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study
    Senem Koruk
    Ayse Mizrak
    Rauf Gul
    Ertugrul Kilic
    Fatih Yendi
    Unsal Oner
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2010, 24 : 858 - 863
  • [3] A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and propofol in combination with fentanyl for conscious sedation during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
    Salem, Raafat A.
    Mohamed, Abbady A.
    Moghazy, Hazem E. L.
    Alsagheer, Gamal A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 32 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [4] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Abhilasha
    Ansari, Afroz Alam
    Nath, Rajendra
    Chak, Rakesh Kumar
    Singh, Rajeev Kumar
    Khanna, Richa
    Singh, Prem Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 69 - 81
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus propofol-ketamine for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in hepatic patients (a comparative randomized study)
    Algharabawy, Wael Sayed
    Abusinna, Rasha Gamal
    AbdElrahman, Tamer Nabil
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 37 (01): : 364 - 372
  • [6] Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvant to propofol: comparative study in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
    Ali, Ashgan Raouf
    El Ghoneimy, Mohamed N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (12) : 1058 - 1064
  • [7] Re: Comparison of Ketamine with Midazolam versus Ketamine with Fentanyl for Pediatric Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Study Editorial Comment
    Assimos, Dean G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01): : 26 - 26
  • [8] A Comparison of Oral Midazolam-ketamine, Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl, and Dexmedetomidine-ketamine Combinations as Sedative Agents in Pediatric Dentistry: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jaikaria, Astha
    Thakur, Seema
    Singhal, Parul
    Chauhan, Deepak
    Jayam, Cheranjeevi
    Syal, Kartik
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 : S197 - S203
  • [9] Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial
    Vaishnavi, B. D.
    Goyal, Shilpa
    Sharma, Ankur
    Kothari, Nikhil
    Kaloria, Narendra
    Sethi, Priyanka
    Bhatia, Pradeep
    [J]. ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2023, 55 (02) : 103 - 108
  • [10] Sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging comparative study between dexmedetomidine and ketamine
    Eldeek, Abeer M.
    Elfawal, Sanaa Mohamed
    Allam, Mohamed Gaber
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 32 (03) : 263 - 268