A Comparison of Oral Midazolam-ketamine, Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl, and Dexmedetomidine-ketamine Combinations as Sedative Agents in Pediatric Dentistry: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
|
作者
Jaikaria, Astha [1 ]
Thakur, Seema [1 ]
Singhal, Parul [1 ]
Chauhan, Deepak [1 ]
Jayam, Cheranjeevi [1 ]
Syal, Kartik [2 ]
机构
[1] HP Govt Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Room 310,Third Floor, Shimla 171001, Himachal Prades, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Shimla, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl; dexmedetomidine-ketamine; midazolam-ketamine; pediatric dentistry; sedation;
D O I
10.4103/ccd.ccd_818_17
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: It is common to encounter a patient who is anxious to the magnitude that precludes the possibility of provision of dental treatment. This study aims to evaluate and compare the sedative effect of oral combinations of midazolam-ketamine (MK), dexmedetomidine-fentanyl (DF), and dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) in a group of uncooperative children requiring dental treatment. Methodology: This was a prospective, randomized, triple-blind study where 36 children who were 3-9 year old with American Society of Anesthesiologists -I status and presenting early childhood caries were randomly assigned to: Group A -0.3 mg/kg of M and 5 mg/kg K, Group B -2 ug/kg of D with 3 ug/kg of F, and Group C - 2ug/kg of D with 5 mg/kg of K in 1 mL honey. Patients' blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded from the start of the procedure till discharge. Patients' behavior, sedation status, and wake-up behavior were evaluated with Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale and ease of treatment completion by Houpt scale. Results: Hemodynamic changes were statistically insignificant in all three groups. 72.8% of patients in Group A and 58.3% of patients in Group B were successfully sedated during treatment. Behavior improvement was seen in all three groups during treatment with statistically insignificant difference in behavior scores produced by Group C. Ease of treatment completion was moderately better with Group A. Conclusion: Oral DK has a comparable sedative property with oral MK combination. Oral DF promises to be a potential sedative agent for children due to its successful anxiolysis.
引用
收藏
页码:S197 / S203
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Abhilasha
    Ansari, Afroz Alam
    Nath, Rajendra
    Chak, Rakesh Kumar
    Singh, Rajeev Kumar
    Khanna, Richa
    Singh, Prem Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 69 - 81
  • [2] Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine combination as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Malhotra, Parul Uppal
    Thakur, Seema
    Singhal, Parul
    Chauhan, Deepak
    Jayam, Cheranjeevi
    Sood, Ritu
    Malhotra, Yagyeshwar
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [3] Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial
    Vaishnavi, B. D.
    Goyal, Shilpa
    Sharma, Ankur
    Kothari, Nikhil
    Kaloria, Narendra
    Sethi, Priyanka
    Bhatia, Pradeep
    [J]. ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2023, 55 (02) : 103 - 108
  • [4] Midazolam-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-ketamine combinations for anesthesia of pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization
    Menshawi, Mohammed Abdelsalam
    Fahim, Hany Magdy
    [J]. AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 11 (1)
  • [5] Comparison of oral Midazolam and Midazolam-Ketamine as sedative agents in paediatric dentistry
    Cagiran, E.
    Eyigor, C.
    Sipahi, A.
    Koca, H.
    Balcioglu, T.
    Uyar, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 11 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [6] Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and midazolam-ketamine combinations for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized prospective study
    Koruk, Senem
    Mizrak, Ayse
    Gul, Rauf
    Kilic, Ertugrul
    Yendi, Fatih
    Oner, Unsal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2010, 24 (06) : 858 - 863
  • [7] Comparison of Effects of Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and Dexmedetomidine-midazolam Combinations in Transurethral Procedures
    Kose, Emine Arzu
    Honca, Mehtap
    Yilmaz, Erdal
    Batislam, Ertan
    Apan, Alpaslan
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (06) : 1214 - 1219
  • [8] A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Combination Sedation for Transthoracic Echocardiography in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sun, Mang
    Liu, Hui
    Yu, Qing
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Jing
    Lei, Yao
    Zhao, Qing-yan
    Li, Shang-yingying
    Tu, Sheng-fen
    Wei, Guang-hui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (06) : 1550 - 1555
  • [9] Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine-midazolam-fentanyl for monitored anesthesia care during chemoport insertion: a Prospective Randomized Study
    Eun Hee Chun
    Myeong Jae Han
    Hee Jung Baik
    Hahck Soo Park
    Rack Kyung Chung
    Jong In Han
    Hun Jung Lee
    Jong Hak Kim
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 16
  • [10] The effect of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination versus dexmedetomidine on behavior of uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    El-Rouby, Sara Hassan
    Crystal, Yasmi O.
    Elshafie, Ahmed M.
    Wahba, Nadia A.
    El-Tekeya, Magda M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2024, 32