Can we teach morality without influencing the worldview of students?
被引:0
|
作者:
van der Kooij, Jacomijn C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci Theory & Res Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Assoc Catholic & Christian Sch Netherlands, Verus, Woerden, NetherlandsVrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci Theory & Res Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
van der Kooij, Jacomijn C.
[1
,2
]
de Ruyter, Doret J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci Theory & Res Educ, Amsterdam, NetherlandsVrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci Theory & Res Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
de Ruyter, Doret J.
[1
]
Miedema, Siebren
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Theol, Dept Praxis, Amsterdam, NetherlandsVrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci Theory & Res Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Miedema, Siebren
[3
]
机构:
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci Theory & Res Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Assoc Catholic & Christian Sch Netherlands, Verus, Woerden, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Theol, Dept Praxis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Broad morality;
Narrow morality;
Organised worldview;
Personal worldview;
Relationship worldview and morality;
D O I:
10.1007/s40839-016-0022-4
中图分类号:
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号:
010107 ;
摘要:
The central question in this article is whether teaching morality necessarily means paying attention to 'worldview'. We investigate a conceptual and a justificatory relationship between these two. A distinction is made between organised and personal worldview and between narrow and broad morality. Some schools want to avoid influence on the students' views based on organised worldviews they adhere to. This is not always possible. The article explains why. It demonstrates that that when one teaches broad morality, attention is paid to the personal worldview of students. Finally, the article discusses the implications of our analysis for reflections on education.