Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study

被引:14
|
作者
Bawahab, Mohammed A. [1 ]
Abd El Maksoud, Walid M. [1 ]
Alsareii, Saeed A. [2 ]
Al Amri, Fahad S. [1 ]
Ali, Hala F. [1 ]
Nimeri, Abdul Rahman [2 ,3 ]
Al Amri, Abdul Rahman M. [2 ]
Assiri, Adel A.
Aziz, Mohammed I. Abdul [4 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg Dept, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
[2] Najran Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Najran 1988, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sheikh Khalifa Med City, Gen Surg Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[4] Abha Private Hosp, Gen Surg, Abha 61431, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH | 2014年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
acute cholecystitis; routine drainage; cholecystectomy; subhepatic collection;
D O I
10.7555/JBR.28.20130095
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Many surgeons practice prophylactic drainage after cholecystectomy without reliable evidence. This study was conducted to answer the question whether to drain or not to drain after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. A retrospective review of all patients who had cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, was conducted from April 2010 to April 2012. Data were extracted from hospital case files. Preoperative data included clinical presentation, routine investigations and liver function tests. Operative data included excessive adhesions, bleeding, bile leak, and drain insertion. Complicated cases such as pericholecystic collections, mucocele and empyema were also reported. Patients who needed therapeutic drainage were excluded. Postoperative data included hospital stay, volume of drained fluid, time of drain removal, and drain site problems. The study included 103 patients allocated into two groups; group A (n = 5 38) for patients with operative drain insertion and group B (n = 5 65) for patients without drain insertion. The number of patients with preoperative diagnosis of acute non-complicated cholecystitis was significantly greater in group B (80%) than group A (36.8%) (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in group A. All patients who were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were in group A. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospital stay was significantly (P < 0.001) longer in patients with preoperative complications. There was no added benefit for prophylactic drain insertion after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in non- complicated or in complicated cases.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 245
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous gallbladder drainage for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis
    Kim, KH
    Sung, CK
    Park, BK
    Kim, WK
    Whan, C
    Kim, KS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (02): : 111 - 113
  • [22] Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Picchio, Marcello
    De Cesare, Alessandro
    Di Filippo, Annalisa
    Spaziani, Martina
    Spaziani, Erasmo
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2019, 71 (02) : 247 - 254
  • [23] Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marcello Picchio
    Alessandro De Cesare
    Annalisa Di Filippo
    Martina Spaziani
    Erasmo Spaziani
    Updates in Surgery, 2019, 71 : 247 - 254
  • [24] Optimal timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous gallbladder drainage for severe cholecystitis
    Koetsu Inoue
    Tatsuya Ueno
    Orie Nishina
    Daisuke Douchi
    Kentaro Shima
    Shinji Goto
    Michinaga Takahashi
    Chikashi Shibata
    Hiroo Naito
    BMC Gastroenterology, 17
  • [25] Optimal timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous gallbladder drainage for severe cholecystitis
    Inoue, Koetsu
    Ueno, Tatsuya
    Nishina, Orie
    Douchi, Daisuke
    Shima, Kentaro
    Goto, Shinji
    Takahashi, Michinaga
    Shibata, Chikashi
    Naito, Hiroo
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [26] DRAINAGE AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    MORRISON, JD
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1980, 62 (06) : 485 - 485
  • [27] Wound drainage versus non-drainage for proximal femoral fractures. A prospective randomised study
    Joshy, S
    Tharian, B
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (01): : 85 - 85
  • [28] DRAINAGE AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    HOBBS, KEF
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1982, 64 (05) : 355 - 355
  • [29] DRAINAGE AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    ORR, N
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1981, 63 (01) : 64 - 64
  • [30] DRAINAGE AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    HAGAN, B
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1980, 62 (05) : 392 - 392