Scientific Opinion on electrical requirements for poultry waterbath stunning equipment

被引:9
|
作者
Authie, Edith [1 ]
Berg, Charlotte [1 ]
Botner, Anette [1 ]
Browman, Howard [1 ]
Capua, Ilaria [1 ]
De Koeijer, Aline [1 ]
Depner, Klaus [1 ]
Domingo, Mariano [1 ]
Edwards, Sandra [1 ]
Fourichon, Christine [1 ]
Koenen, Frank [1 ]
More, Simon [1 ]
Raj, Mohan [1 ]
Sihvonen, Liisa [1 ]
Spoolder, Hans [1 ]
Stegeman, Jan Arend [1 ]
Thulke, Hans-Hermann [1 ]
Vagsholm, Ivar [1 ]
Velarde, Antonio [1 ]
Willeberg, Preben [1 ]
Zientara, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
poultry; waterbath; electric; stunning; parameter; welfare; EEG;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3745
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The European Commission (EC) requested that the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW Panel) delivers a scientific opinion on a study that proposes parameters for poultry electrical waterbath stunning different to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. The submitted study reports upon the use (mean + SD) of a current of 104.00 +/- 3.88 mA, a voltage of 125.86 +/- 3.28 V and a frequency of 589.78 +/- 0.63 Hz using a square wave in alternating current (AC) with a 50 % duty cycle. These conditions were applied for 15 seconds to chickens under laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions. The submitted study was peer-reviewed by the AHAW Panel in the manner detailed in its ` Guidance on the assessment criteria for studies evaluating the effectiveness of stunning intervention regarding animal protection at the time of killing'. The methodology and the data reported do not provide conclusive evidence that the combination of the proposed electrical frequency and current induced unconsciousness without exposing the chickens to avoidable pain and suffering. Further, some chickens did not remain unconscious for a sufficient time to prevent avoidable pain and suffering during slaughter. Because the information provided in the study was incomplete and insufficient, it did not pass the eligibility phase of the assessment. In the context of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and current scientific evidence, a frequency of 600 Hz with a current of 104 mA does not result in efficient stunning of poultry. Therefore, additional research into these stunning parameters is not recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electrical waterbath stunning: Influence of different waveform and voltage settings on the induction of unconsciousness and death in male and female broiler chickens
    Prinz, S.
    Van Oijen, G.
    Ehinger, F.
    Bessei, W.
    Coenen, A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2012, 91 (04) : 998 - 1008
  • [22] Scientific Opinion on Lime Treatment of Solid Pig and Poultry Manure
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Budka, Herbert
    Buncic, Sava
    Collins, John D.
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie Hendrik
    Hope, James
    Kleinue, Guenter
    McLauchlin, James
    Messens, Winy
    Mueller-Graf, Christine
    Nguyen-The, Christophe
    Noerrung, Birgit
    Peixe, Luisa
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Ricci, Antonia
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07)
  • [23] Effect of electrical stunning frequency and current waveform in poultry welfare and meat quality
    Siqueira, T. S.
    Borges, T. D.
    Rocha, R. M. M.
    Figueira, P. T.
    Luciano, F. B.
    Macedo, R. E. F.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2017, 96 (08) : 2956 - 2964
  • [24] Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs
    Aquilina, Gabriele
    Bampidis, Vasileios
    Bastos, Maria De Lourdes
    Costa, Lucio Guido
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Gralak, Mikolaj Antoni
    Hogstrand, Christer
    Leng, Lubomir
    Lopez-Puente, Secundino
    Martelli, Giovanna
    Mayo, Baltasar
    Ramos, Fernando
    Renshaw, Derek
    Rychen, Guido
    Saarela, Maria
    Seirsen, Kristen
    Van Beeler, Patrick
    Wallace, Robert John
    Westendorf, Johannes
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (01)
  • [25] Scientific Opinion on Isolation in proofed pit on-farm of dead poultry
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Budka, Herbert
    Buncic, Sava
    Collins, John D.
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie
    Hope, James
    Klein, Gunter
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    McLauchlin, James
    Muller Graf, Christine
    Nguyen The, Christophe
    Noerrung, Birgit
    Peixe, Luisa
    Maradona, Miguel Prieto
    Ricci, Antonia
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (11)
  • [27] Poultry - The facts in favor of controlled atmosphere stunning - Multi-phase CAS systems as alternatives to electrical water bath stunning
    Gade, PB
    von Holleben, K
    von Wenzlawowicz, M
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2001, 81 (12): : 26 - 29
  • [28] CODE WORDS - ELECTRICAL STUNNING - POULTRY - VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION - ANIMAL-WELFARE
    SCHUTTABRAHAM, I
    WORMUTH, HJ
    FESSEL, J
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1987, 100 (10): : 332 - 340
  • [29] ELECTRICAL TERMINOLOGY, MEASUREMENTS AND UNITS ASSOCIATED WITH STUNNING TECHNIQUE IN POULTRY-PROCESSING PLANTS
    INGLING, AL
    KUENZEL, WJ
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1978, 57 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [30] EFFECT OF SALINITY IN A WATER BATH STUNNER ON THE AMPERAGE OBTAINED DURING ELECTRICAL STUNNING OF POULTRY
    SCHUTTABRAHAM, I
    KNAUERKRAETZL, B
    WORMUTH, HJ
    GREGORY, NG
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1991, 71 (11): : 1286 - 1289