Scientific Opinion on electrical requirements for poultry waterbath stunning equipment

被引:9
|
作者
Authie, Edith [1 ]
Berg, Charlotte [1 ]
Botner, Anette [1 ]
Browman, Howard [1 ]
Capua, Ilaria [1 ]
De Koeijer, Aline [1 ]
Depner, Klaus [1 ]
Domingo, Mariano [1 ]
Edwards, Sandra [1 ]
Fourichon, Christine [1 ]
Koenen, Frank [1 ]
More, Simon [1 ]
Raj, Mohan [1 ]
Sihvonen, Liisa [1 ]
Spoolder, Hans [1 ]
Stegeman, Jan Arend [1 ]
Thulke, Hans-Hermann [1 ]
Vagsholm, Ivar [1 ]
Velarde, Antonio [1 ]
Willeberg, Preben [1 ]
Zientara, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
poultry; waterbath; electric; stunning; parameter; welfare; EEG;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3745
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The European Commission (EC) requested that the EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW Panel) delivers a scientific opinion on a study that proposes parameters for poultry electrical waterbath stunning different to those laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. The submitted study reports upon the use (mean + SD) of a current of 104.00 +/- 3.88 mA, a voltage of 125.86 +/- 3.28 V and a frequency of 589.78 +/- 0.63 Hz using a square wave in alternating current (AC) with a 50 % duty cycle. These conditions were applied for 15 seconds to chickens under laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions. The submitted study was peer-reviewed by the AHAW Panel in the manner detailed in its ` Guidance on the assessment criteria for studies evaluating the effectiveness of stunning intervention regarding animal protection at the time of killing'. The methodology and the data reported do not provide conclusive evidence that the combination of the proposed electrical frequency and current induced unconsciousness without exposing the chickens to avoidable pain and suffering. Further, some chickens did not remain unconscious for a sufficient time to prevent avoidable pain and suffering during slaughter. Because the information provided in the study was incomplete and insufficient, it did not pass the eligibility phase of the assessment. In the context of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and current scientific evidence, a frequency of 600 Hz with a current of 104 mA does not result in efficient stunning of poultry. Therefore, additional research into these stunning parameters is not recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on the electrical requirements for waterbath stunning equipment applicable for poultry EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Jorg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (06)
  • [2] Assessment of stunning effectiveness according to the present scientific knowledge on electrical stunning of poultry in a waterbath
    von Wenzlawowicz, M
    von Holleben, K
    ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 2001, 65 (05): : 193 - 198
  • [3] Head-only electrical stunning of poultry using a waterbath: a feasibility study
    Lines, J. A.
    Raj, A. B. M.
    Wotton, S. B.
    O'Callaghan, M.
    Knowles, T. G.
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (04) : 432 - 438
  • [4] Testing the performance of electrical stunning equipment for poultry
    Berry, PS
    Meeks, IR
    Tinker, DB
    Frost, AR
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2002, 151 (13) : 388 - 390
  • [5] Scientific Opinion on the electrical parameters for the stunning of lambs and kid goats
    Authie, Edith
    Berg, Charlotte
    Botner, Anette
    Browman, Howard
    Capua, Ilaria
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Depner, Klaus
    Domingo, Mariano
    Edwards, Sandra
    Fourichon, Christine
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Raj, Mohan
    Sihvonen, Liisa
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Velarde, Antonio
    Willeberg, Preben
    Zientara, Stephan
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (06)
  • [6] EFFECT OF DEPTH OF IMMERSION IN THE WATERBATH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRICAL STUNNING IN CHICKENS
    GREGORY, NG
    WOTTON, SB
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1991, 51 (02) : 200 - 202
  • [7] Diversity, not uniformity: slaughter and electrical waterbath stunning procedures in Belgian slaughterhouses
    Devos, G.
    Moons, C. P. H.
    Houf, K.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2018, 97 (09) : 3369 - 3379
  • [8] Broiler carcass quality using head-only electrical stunning in a waterbath
    Lines, J. A.
    Wotton, S. B.
    Barker, R.
    Spence, J.
    Wilkins, L.
    Knowles, T. G.
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (04) : 439 - 445
  • [9] EFFECT OF INCOMPLETE IMMERSION OF THE HEAD IN WATERBATH STUNNERS ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRICAL STUNNING IN DUCKS
    GREGORY, NG
    WOTTON, SB
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1992, 53 (02) : 269 - 270
  • [10] Electroencephalograms and physical reflexes of broilers after electrical waterbath stunning using an alternating current
    Prinz, S.
    Van Oijen, G.
    Ehinger, F.
    Coenen, A.
    Bessei, W.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2010, 89 (06) : 1265 - 1274