What have we learned about ADHD from the structural neuroimaging studies?

被引:0
|
作者
Dabkowska, Malgorzata [1 ]
机构
[1] UMK Toruniu, Katedra & Klin Psychiat CM Bydgoszczy, Ul Kurpinskiego 19, PL-85096 Bydgoszcz, Poland
关键词
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); structural neuroimaging; children; abnormalities; brain; physiopathology; morphometric study; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) belongs to the most common behavioural disorders of childhood. ADHD can be conceptualised as a diverse developmental disorder characterised by a variable clinical expression, which is underlain by heterogeneity leading to the neural system dysfunction. Neuroimaging for childhood psychiatric disorders has the potential to increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of childhood mental disorders. In recent years, neuroimaging techniques have been used with increasing frequency in attempts to identify structural and functional abnormalities in the brains of children with ADHD. Structural imaging methods have localized abnormalities in key brain regions and neural networks associated with cognition and behaviour consistent with the clinical picture of ADHD. Structural imaging studies suggest that the ADHD pathophysiology would be conditioned by the dysfunction in frontosubcortical pathways. Currently increasing is the evidence that other brain regions such as the cerebellum, the parietal lobes and temporal lobes may also have an important role in this condition. The findings generally suggest deficits in the brain areas mentioned above, with decreased volumes. However, it is also evident that some areas show enlargement as a compensation for the observed deficits. Apart from the issue of reliability, there is a more basic question about how the results of neuroimaging studies are to be interpreted.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 204
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cluster headache pathophysiology: What we have learned from advanced neuroimaging
    Silvestro, Marcello
    Tessitore, Alessandro
    Orologio, Ilaria
    Battista, Giorgia
    Siciliano, Mattia
    Tedeschi, Gioacchino
    Russo, Antonio
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (04): : 436 - 452
  • [22] What have we learned about the engram?
    Najenson, Jonathan
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2021, 199 (3-4) : 9581 - 9601
  • [23] What we have learned about preeclampsia
    Sibai, BM
    Caritis, S
    Hauth, J
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2003, 27 (03) : 239 - 246
  • [24] WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT SELECTION
    GRAFF, OB
    KIMBROUGH, RB
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1956, 37 (07) : 294 - 296
  • [25] What have we learned about the engram?
    Jonathan Najenson
    [J]. Synthese, 2021, 199 : 9581 - 9601
  • [26] WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED ABOUT NEUTRINOS
    OKUN, LB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEUTRINO PHYSICS AND ASTROPHYSICS, 1989, : 828 - 843
  • [27] What kinds of question can we ask about attention using neuroimaging: What have we learned, what might we learn?
    Shulman, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 : 9 - 9
  • [28] From neuroimaging to clinical setting: what have we learned from migraine pain?
    Colombo, Bruno
    Dalla Costa, Gloria
    Dalla Libera, Dacia
    Comi, Giancarlo
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 33 : S95 - S97
  • [29] From neuroimaging to clinical setting: what have we learned from migraine pain?
    Bruno Colombo
    Gloria Dalla Costa
    Dacia Dalla Libera
    Giancarlo Comi
    [J]. Neurological Sciences, 2012, 33 : 95 - 97
  • [30] Functional neuroimaging of the child brain: What have we learned?
    Casey, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, : 11 - 11