RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TIME-DOMAIN KOHLRAUSCH-WILLIAMS-WATTS AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN HAVRILIAK-NEGAMI RELAXATION FUNCTIONS

被引:630
|
作者
ALVAREZ, F
ALEGRIA, A
COLMENERO, J
机构
[1] Departamento de Física de Materiales, Facultad de Química, 20080 San Sebastin
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW B | 1991年 / 44卷 / 14期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7306
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) and the Havriliak-Negami (HN) relaxation functions have been widely used to describe the relaxation behavior of glass-forming liquids and complex systems. While the HN relaxation function is a frequency function, the natural domain of the KWW relaxation function is time (although it has also been used with frequency-domain spectroscopies). A relationship among the parameters of the two models is suggested by the fact that both models yield an accurate description of real data. Nevertheless, this relationship cannot be an analytical one, since it is known that the HN and the KWW relaxation functions are not exactly Fourier transforms of each other. In order to find out the nature of this relationship, a method which makes use of a distribution of relaxation times is proposed here. Numerical simulations following the KWW model have been assumed to describe the relaxation behavior in time; likewise, the HN description was assumed to be valid for the frequency domain. From this work, a connection among the parameters of both models is obtained, which is expected to be valid for those experimental data that can be described by either the KWW or the HN model. This is the case for most, if not all, measurements on the dynamics in complex systems and glass-forming liquids that frequently appear in the literature. The proposed procedure has been tested by using dielectric-spectroscopy measurements, both in frequency and time domains to study the alpha-relaxation in a glass-forming polymeric system, poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol-A).
引用
收藏
页码:7306 / 7312
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    Hernandez-Becerra, P. A. I.
    Balleza-Ordaz, M.
    Vargas-Luna, M.
    Delgadillo-Holtfort, I.
    INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 62 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [42] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    P. A. I. Hernández-Becerra
    M. Balleza-Ordaz
    M. Vargas-Luna
    I. Delgadillo-Holtfort
    Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 2019, 62 : 241 - 246
  • [43] Design PID controllers for desired time-domain or frequency-domain response
    Zhang, WD
    Xi, YG
    Yang, GK
    Xu, XM
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2002, 41 (04) : 511 - 520
  • [44] Cognitive processing in sleep as revealed by time-domain and frequency-domain components
    Karakas, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 69 (03) : 154 - 154
  • [45] A Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Microwave Imaging of Experimental Targets
    Saraskanroud, Forouz Mahdinezhad
    Jeffrey, Ian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 7 (07) : 611 - 623
  • [46] Numerical methods for time-domain and frequency-domain analysis: applications in engineering
    Tamas, R. D.
    MODERN TECHNOLOGIES IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING (MODTECH2015), 2015, 95
  • [47] Time-Domain vs. Frequency-Domain Equalization for FTN Signaling
    Li, Shuangyang
    Yuan, Weijie
    Yuan, Jinhong
    Bai, Baoming
    Ng, Derrick Wing Kwan
    Hanzo, Lajos
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (08) : 9174 - 9179
  • [48] Time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to identification of bridge flutter derivatives
    Chen Z.
    Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2009, 3 (2): : 173 - 179
  • [49] A frequency-domain SIR maximizing time-domain equalizer for VDSL systems
    Lin, YP
    Liang, LH
    Chung, PJ
    Phoong, SM
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS), VOLS 1-6, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 3163 - 3166
  • [50] A SIMPLE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS
    GOMEZTREVINO, E
    GEOPHYSICS, 1987, 52 (10) : 1418 - 1423