CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS - MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION OF 6 DIAGNOSTIC METHODS

被引:50
|
作者
MACPHERSON, DW
MCQUEEN, R
机构
[1] ST JOSEPHS HOSP, REG PARASITOL LAB, HAMILTON L8N 4A6, ON, CANADA
[2] CHEDOKE MCMASTER HOSP, MCMASTER DIV, INFECT DIS & TROP MED CLIN, HAMILTON L8N 3Z5, ON, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.31.2.198-202.1993
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Six diagnostic methods (Giemsa staining, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, auramine-rhodamine staining, Sheather's sugar flotation, an indirect immunofluorescence procedure, and a modified concentration-sugar flotation method) for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in stool specimens were compared on the following attributes: diagnostic yield, cost to perform each test, ease of handling, and ability to process large numbers of specimens for screening purposes by batching. A rank ordering from least desirable to most desirable was then established for each method by using the study attributes. The process of decision analysis with respect to the laboratory diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is discussed through the application of multiattribute utility theory to the rank ordering of the study criteria. Within a specific health care setting, a diagnostic facility will be able to calculate its own utility scores for our study attributes. Multiattribute evaluation and analysis are potentially powerful tools in the allocation of resources in the laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 202
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methods in informatics: Development of a multiattribute utility questionnaire
    Panniers, Teresa L.
    CONSUMER-CENTERED COMPUTER-SUPPPORTED CARE FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE, 2006, 122 : 124 - +
  • [32] INCORPORATING PARAMETER VARIABILITY IN MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION
    RANDHAWA, SU
    WEST, TM
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1992, 23 (1-4) : 389 - 392
  • [33] EVALUATION OF PARTIALLY DESCRIBED MULTIATTRIBUTE OPTIONS
    YATES, JF
    JAGACINSKI, CM
    FABER, MD
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1978, 21 (02): : 240 - 251
  • [34] SIMPLE MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION
    EINHORN, HJ
    MCCOACH, W
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1977, 22 (04): : 270 - 282
  • [35] Diagnostic Methods, 6th edition
    Lederer, Arthur
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1920, 10 (11) : 883 - 883
  • [36] A multiattribute utility evaluation of different methods for the detection of enteric protozoa causing diarrhea in AIDS patients
    Lekha Tuli
    Deepak K Singh
    Anil K Gulati
    Shyam Sundar
    Tribhuban M Mohapatra
    BMC Microbiology, 10
  • [37] COMPARING MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION PROCESS MODELS
    PERREAULT, WD
    RUSS, FA
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1977, 22 (06): : 423 - 431
  • [38] Mapping between 6 Multiattribute Utility Instruments
    Chen, Gang
    Khan, Munir A.
    Iezzi, Angelo
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Richardson, Jeff
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (02) : 160 - 175
  • [39] AN EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS IN LIBYA
    ABOUDAYA, MA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ZOONOSES, 1986, 13 (04): : 282 - 285
  • [40] EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN BREAST-CANCER
    GEST, J
    NOUVELLE PRESSE MEDICALE, 1982, 11 (17): : 1295 - 1297