CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS - MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION OF 6 DIAGNOSTIC METHODS

被引:50
|
作者
MACPHERSON, DW
MCQUEEN, R
机构
[1] ST JOSEPHS HOSP, REG PARASITOL LAB, HAMILTON L8N 4A6, ON, CANADA
[2] CHEDOKE MCMASTER HOSP, MCMASTER DIV, INFECT DIS & TROP MED CLIN, HAMILTON L8N 3Z5, ON, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.31.2.198-202.1993
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Six diagnostic methods (Giemsa staining, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, auramine-rhodamine staining, Sheather's sugar flotation, an indirect immunofluorescence procedure, and a modified concentration-sugar flotation method) for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in stool specimens were compared on the following attributes: diagnostic yield, cost to perform each test, ease of handling, and ability to process large numbers of specimens for screening purposes by batching. A rank ordering from least desirable to most desirable was then established for each method by using the study attributes. The process of decision analysis with respect to the laboratory diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is discussed through the application of multiattribute utility theory to the rank ordering of the study criteria. Within a specific health care setting, a diagnostic facility will be able to calculate its own utility scores for our study attributes. Multiattribute evaluation and analysis are potentially powerful tools in the allocation of resources in the laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 202
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of conventional diagnostic methods for detection of bovine cryptosporidiosis
    Venu, R.
    Latha, B. R.
    Basith, S. Abdul
    Sreekumar, C.
    Raj, G. Dhinakar
    Raman, M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2013, 83 (02): : 124 - 128
  • [2] THE MEANINGS OF TRADE-OFFS IN MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION METHODS - A COMPARISON
    LAI, SK
    HOPKINS, LD
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1989, 16 (02): : 155 - 170
  • [3] EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS
    THIRY, E
    PASTORET, PP
    ANNALES DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 1992, 136 (04) : 269 - 272
  • [4] EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS
    RICHTER, K
    KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1990, 68 (06): : 297 - 298
  • [5] Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
    不详
    Int J Approximate Reasoning, 4 (281-310):
  • [6] Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods
    Triantaphyllou, E
    Lin, CT
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1996, 14 (04) : 281 - 310
  • [7] On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods
    Pöyhönen, M
    Hämäläinen, RP
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 129 (03) : 569 - 585
  • [8] EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS IN ESOPHAGITIS
    WIENBECK, M
    BERGES, W
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1984, 19 : 80 - 86
  • [9] Evaluation of the diagnostic methods of onychomycosis
    Zanardi, Daniela
    Nunes, Daniel Holthausen
    Pacheco, Alexsandra da Silva
    Tubone, Mariana Quirino
    de Souza Filho, Jorge Jose, Jr.
    ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA, 2008, 83 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [10] Evaluation of diagnostic methods.
    Doyon, F
    Hill, C
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2001, 82 (02): : 117 - 125