On 16 June 2016, the US Supreme Court delivered an opinion addressing the appropriate standard for the attorney fee shifting provision of the Copyright Act, 17 USC A 505. Writing for a unanimous court, Justice Kagan agreed with the 'objective reasonableness' standard employed by the District Court in denying award of attorney's fees, but remanded the decision for further consideration after stressing that the reasonableness inquiry is only one part of the A 505 analysis and is not controlling. Courts should instead examine all relevant factors when considering whether to award attorney's fees.
机构:
Max Planck Inst Comparat Publ Law & Int Law, Heidelberg, Germany
European Univ Inst, Fiesole, ItalyMax Planck Inst Comparat Publ Law & Int Law, Heidelberg, Germany