Importance of Ecological Economics in the Undergraduate Environmental Sciences and Sustainability Curricula

被引:0
|
作者
Klimas, Christie [1 ]
机构
[1] DePaul Univ, Environm Sci & Studies, McGowan South 203D,2400 North Sheffield Ave, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1466046614000209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For students of environmental science and studies, as well as students in sustainability programs, critical thinking about the economy-environment interdependence is a key learning objective and a foundational part of the undergraduate curriculum. There are many courses that could provide initial exposure to economic theory. However, not all are as adept at providing this combination of critical thinking, relevance to important global issues, and economy-environment interdependence. This article looks at neoclassical economics, environmental economics, and ecological economics and uses the literature to weigh which of these courses would be most well suited for an introductory economics course in environmental science and studies and sustainability undergraduate curriculum. Introductory courses in neoclassical economics have been criticized for avoiding controversy, failing to consider the moral dilemmas with economic theory and policy, and excluding ethics. Additionally, neoclassical economics treats the study of economyenvironment interdependence as an optional extra rather than as one of the immutable foundations of the field. Environmental economics uses a variety of techniques to assign market values to externalities like ecosystem services, pollution, and natural resource depletion so that they can be incorporated into the market model. These techniques alone, however, do not provide a correct framework through which to view the interdependence between the economy and the environment. Ecological economics, while far from the current economic paradigm, allows for critical consideration of this interdependence.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustainability and environmental economics: An alternative text
    Green, C
    AREA, 1998, 30 (02) : 188 - 189
  • [32] Environmental economics and ecological economics: Where they can converge?
    Venkatachalam, L.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 61 (2-3) : 550 - 558
  • [33] Environmental economics, ecological economics, and the concept of sustainable development
    Munda, G
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 1997, 6 (02) : 213 - 233
  • [34] Ecological economics: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics
    van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2001, 2 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [35] Ecological economics: themes, approaches, and differences with environmental economics
    Jeroen C. van den Bergh
    Regional Environmental Change, 2001, 2 : 13 - 23
  • [36] From ecological sciences to environmental ethics
    Rozzi, Ricardo
    REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL, 2007, 80 (04) : 521 - 522
  • [37] AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
    LEE, DHK
    BIOSCIENCE, 1965, 15 (08) : 524 - &
  • [38] A review of undergraduate environmental engineering education in Australia: Philosophies and curricula
    Mitchell, CA
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 1996, : 103 - 112
  • [39] ECOLOGICAL EPICENTER - INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
    WOHLERS, HC
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 1972, 15 (02): : 44 - &
  • [40] Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences
    Fraisl, Dilek
    Hager, Gerid
    Bedessem, Baptiste
    Gold, Margaret
    Hsing, Pen-Yuan
    Danielsen, Finn
    Hitchcock, Colleen B.
    Hulbert, Joseph M.
    Piera, Jaume
    Spiers, Helen
    Thiel, Martin
    Haklay, Mordechai
    NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS, 2022, 2 (01):