ASSESSMENT OF YIELD LOSSES AS A RESULT OF COINFECTION BY MAIZE STREAK VIRUS AND MAIZE STRIPE VIRUS IN MAURITIUS

被引:3
|
作者
DEDOYLE, MMR [1 ]
AUTREY, LJC [1 ]
机构
[1] MAURITIUS SUGAR IND RES INST,REDUIT,MAURITIUS
关键词
MAIZE STREAK VIRUS; MAIZE STRIPE VIRUS; COINFECTION; YIELD LOSSES; ELISA; NONCAPSID PROTEIN DETECTION; PEREGRINUS-MAIDIS; CICADULINA-MBILA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7348.1992.tb04904.x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The effect of co-infection by maize streak virus (MSV) and maize stripe virus (MStV) on plant growth and grain yield was investigated in a susceptible variety of maize (Zea mays), ZS 5206, in Mauritius. Under natural conditions MSV, transmitted by the leafhopper Cicadulina mbila, was normally established before MStV, which is vectored by the planthopper Peregrinus maidis; as a result, MStV symptoms were often partially or completely masked by those of MSV, making MStV detection by symptomatology very unreliable. MSV and MStV were diagnosed by ELISA and MStV by a novel method of detecting the MStV-coded non-capsid protein. The maize hybrid ZS 5206 was inoculated with either MSV, MStV or both, at two stages in the growth cycle (3-5 or 7-10 leaf stage). A greater reduction in plant growth was observed in plants inoculated singly with MStV (80% and 29% for first and second stage, respectively) than with MSV (50% and 23%, respectively). No cobs were produced by plants singly infected with MStV at the first stage, or co-infected with MSV and MStV at both stages; however, marginal grain production was recorded in plants singly infected with MSV at the first stage (91% reduction), or infected either with MSV or MStV, at the second stage (65% and 80% reduction, respectively). In maize hybrid ZS 5206, MStV is more virulent than MSV; co-infection by both viruses causes greater reductions in plant growth and grain yield than single infection by either virus at a given stage of plant development. In the event of co-infection by MSV and MStV, yield losses can be erroneously attributed to MSV only if the symptoms of MStV are masked by those of the former and if adequate methods for MStV detection are not used.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultrastructure of maize necrotic streak virus infections
    De Stradis, A
    Redinbaugh, MG
    Abt, JJ
    Martelli, GP
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2005, 87 (03) : 213 - 221
  • [32] MAIZE STRIPE VIRUS - CHARACTERISTICS OF A MEMBER OF A NEW VIRUS CLASS
    GINGERY, RE
    NAULT, LR
    BRADFUTE, OE
    VIROLOGY, 1981, 112 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [33] Diallelic analysis of maize streak virus resistance in quality protein maize topcrosses
    Omolaran Bashir Bello
    Euphytica, 2017, 213
  • [34] The development of genetically modified maize resistant to Maize streak virus and tolerant to drought
    Thomson, J. A.
    Shepherd, D.
    Okoth, R. O.
    Iyer, R.
    Rafudeen, S.
    Farrant, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 150 : S550 - S550
  • [35] AGROBACTERIUM-MEDIATED DELIVERY OF INFECTIOUS MAIZE STREAK VIRUS INTO MAIZE PLANTS
    GRIMSLEY, N
    HOHN, T
    DAVIES, JW
    HOHN, B
    NATURE, 1987, 325 (6100) : 177 - 179
  • [36] REPLICATION OF MAIZE STREAK VIRUS MUTANTS IN MAIZE PROTOPLASTS - EVIDENCE FOR A MOVEMENT PROTEIN
    BOULTON, MI
    PALLAGHY, CK
    CHATANI, M
    MACFARLANE, S
    DAVIES, JW
    VIROLOGY, 1993, 192 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [37] Diallelic analysis of maize streak virus resistance in quality protein maize topcrosses
    Bello, Omolaran Bashir
    EUPHYTICA, 2017, 213 (12)
  • [38] BREEDING MAIZE LINES FOR COMPLETE AND PARTIAL RESISTANCE TO MAIZE STREAK VIRUS (MSV)
    RODIER, A
    ASSIE, J
    MARCHAND, JL
    HERVE, Y
    EUPHYTICA, 1995, 81 (01) : 57 - 70
  • [39] Spatial dynamics of maize streak virus disease epidemic development in maize fields
    Smith, MC
    Page, WW
    Holt, J
    Kyetere, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2000, 46 (01) : 55 - 66
  • [40] MERISTEMATIC TISSUES OF MAIZE PLANTS ARE MOST SUSCEPTIBLE TO AGROINFECTION WITH MAIZE STREAK VIRUS
    GRIMSLEY, NH
    RAMOS, C
    HEIN, T
    HOHN, B
    BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 6 (02): : 185 - 189