Comparison of Induction and Expectant Management of Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term for Maternal Outcome

被引：0

作者：

Maqbool, Sadaf ^{[1
]}

Usmani, Afshan Saeed ^{[1
]}

Bano, Bushra ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Unit 3, Lahore, Pakistan

来源：

PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2014年 / 8卷 / 03期

关键词：

Induction management; expectant management; prelabour rupture of membranes;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Aim: To compare the outcome of active versus expectant management in patients with PROM at term. Results: The frequency of mode of delivery of patients. There were 187(67%) patients were SVD in group A and 109(39%) patients were in group B. Fetal distress had 63(22%) patients in group A and 100(36%) in group B. Similarly failed induction observed in 15(5%) patients in group A. There was comparison of lower segment caesarean section in both groups. Ninety three (33%) patients were delivered as LSCS in group A while 171(61%) patients were in group B. (p < 0.001), comparison of chorioamnionitis of patient in both groups. There were only 15 (5%) patients of chorioamnionitis in group A while 71(25%) patients had in group B, (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Active management with induction decreases the risk of chorioamnionitis, usually patients are delivered within 24 hours without increasing caesarean delivery rate and decreases the need for oxytocin augmentation.

引用

页码：648 / 651

页数：4

共 50 条

[31] Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term -: No advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours
Akyol, D
Mungan, T
Ünsal, A
Yüksel, K
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (03): : 291 - 295
[32] Outcomes of Expectant Management of Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
Hagen, Irene D.
Bailey, Joanne M.
Zielinski, Ruth E.
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2021, 50 (02): : 122 - 132
[33] Preterm and term prelabour rupture of membranes: A review of timing and methods of labour induction
Delorme, Pierre
Lorthe, Elsa
Sibiude, Jeanne
Kayem, Gilles
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 77 : 27 - 41
[34] Sublingual Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term
Malik, Humaira Zaman
Khawaja, Nuzhat Parveen
Zahid, Bushra
Rehman, Rakhshanda
JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2010, 20 (04): : 242 - 245
[35] Women's evaluations of induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term
Hodnett, ED
Hannah, ME
Weston, JA
Ohlsson, A
Myhr, TL
Wang, EEI
Hewson, SA
Willan, AR
Farine, D
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1997, 24 (04): : 214 - 220
[36] Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term
Wojcieszek, Aleena M.
Stock, Owen M.
Flenady, Vicki
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (10):
[37] Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial)
van der Ham D.P.
Nijhuis J.G.
Mol B.W.J.
van Beek J.J.
Opmeer B.C.
Bijlenga D.
Groenewout M.
Arabin B.
Bloemenkamp K.W.M.
van Wijngaarden W.J.
Wouters M.G.A.J.
Pernet P.J.M.
Porath M.M.
Molkenboer J.F.M.
Derks J.B.
Kars M.M.
Scheepers H.C.J.
Weinans M.J.N.
Woiski M.D.
Wildschut H.I.J.
Willekes C.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 7 (1)
[38] Expectant management for women with prelabour rupture of membranes in the presence of GBS at 34-37 weeks' gestation
Mahomed, Kassam
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (06) : 684 - 684
[39] PREMATURE RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM - POLICY OF EXPECTANT AND ACTIVE MANAGEMENT
ARULKUMARAN, S
ADVANCES IN GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS SERIES, VOL 5: PREGNANCY AND LABOR, 1989, : 73 - 82
[40] Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: Expectant management at home or in hospital?
Hannah, ME
Hodnett, ED
Willan, A
Foster, GA
Di Cecco, R
Helewa, M
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (04): : 533 - 538

← 1 2 3 4 5 →