Online Versus Face-to-Face Accommodations Among College StudentsWith Disabilities

被引:27
|
作者
Barnard-Brak, Lucy [1 ]
Sulak, Tracey [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Waco, TX 76798 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/08923641003604251
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although both the number of online learning opportunities and students with disabilities in higher education has increased over the last two decades, students with disabilities may be overlooked. The purpose of this study was to examine attitudes toward requesting accommodations in the online learning environment among college students with disabilities compared with requesting accommodations in the face-to-face learning environment. Accommodations refer to those adjustments and modification made to instructional and/or curricular requirements in order for students with disabilities to fully participate in a course (Rehabilitation Act of 1973). Results indicate that students with disabilities did not have significantly different attitudes toward requesting accommodations as a whole in the face-to-face versus online learning environments. Results, however, do indicate that students who report having visible disabilities appear to have more positive attitudes toward requesting accommodations in the online versus face-to-face learning environment compared with students who report having hidden disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 91
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Course Delivery on Physical Activity: Face-to-Face Versus Online
    Foster, Chelsea S.
    Nelson, Larry P.
    Hargreaves, Jean Ann
    Ray, Christopher T.
    Buckwalter, John B.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2012, 83 : A44 - A44
  • [22] Choosing Between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Community College Student Voices
    Jaggars, Shanna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2014, 28 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [23] An online premium? Characteristics and performance of online versus face-to-face students in Principles of Microeconomics
    Dendir, Seife
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2016, 91 (02) : 59 - 68
  • [24] Preferences for Online and/or Face-to-Face Counseling among University Students in Malaysia
    Wong, Kah P.
    Bonn, Gregory
    Tam, Cai L.
    Wong, Chee P.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [25] Online or face-to-face? Competition among MOOC and regular education providers
    Han, Haipeng
    Lien, Donald
    Lien, Jaimie W.
    Zheng, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 80 : 857 - 881
  • [26] Impact of an online versus face-to-face instructional format of a Lifetime Fitness course
    Brewer, JD
    Stanbrough, M
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2002, 73 (01) : A5 - A6
  • [27] Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects?
    Baek, Young Min
    Wojcieszak, Magdalena
    Carpini, Michael X. Delli
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2012, 14 (03) : 363 - 383
  • [28] Role immersion in a history course: Online versus face-to-face in Reacting to the Past
    Buchanan, Thomas C.
    Palmer, Edward
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2017, 108 : 85 - 95
  • [29] Children's communication repair strategies: Online versus face-to-face interaction
    Chung, Haeun
    Baik, Kyungrang
    Cheon, Jihye
    Kim, Young Tae
    Yim, Dongsun
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2024, 108
  • [30] Learning ESP in Face-to-face Classes Versus Online Courses: Research Results
    Simonova, Ivana
    2014 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICASS 2014), PT 2, 2014, 52 : 438 - 442