ANESTHETIC BLOCKS FOR LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE

被引:0
|
作者
HARPER, DM
WALSTATTER, BS
LOFTON, BJ
机构
来源
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE | 1994年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
ELECTROSURGERY; PAIN; DYSMENORRHEA; CERVIX DYSPLASIA; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Various types of anesthetic blocks have been used to prevent pain during ambulatory gynecologic surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the pain and cramping perceived by patients during the loop electrosurgical excision procedure when intramucosal or distal paracervical blocks were used. Methods. Seventy-seven women consented to participate in the prospective clinical trial. All women were premedicated with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Immediately after the procedure, a trained interviewer, blinded to the type of anesthetic block, recorded the patient's perceptions of pain and cramping caused by the procedure. Age, parity, marital status, lesion severity, loop size used, number of specimens, amount of bleeding, method of hemostasis, and thermal artifact were included in the analysis. Results. On a Likert scale in which 0=no pain/cramping and 10=worst pain/cramping, the median pain score was 3 for the distal paracervical block and 4 for the intramucosal block. The median cramping scores were 3 and 2, respectively. Pain and cramping scores did not differ significantly between the two block cohorts. The demographic and procedural variables did not predict the perception of pain or cramping. Most (89.6%) of the study population experienced pain, whereas fewer (64.9%) experienced cramping. Subjects reported significantly less cramping than pain, irrespective of the anesthetic block used (chi 2=13.35, P=.0003). Conclusions. There is no difference in the perceptions of pain and cramping resulting from the loop electrosurgical excision procedure between patients receiving an intramucosal block and those receiving a distal paracervical block. There is minimal pain and cramping associated with the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME AFTER LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE
    ROSEN, DJD
    MARGOLIN, ML
    MENASHE, Y
    GREENSPOON, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (01) : 202 - 204
  • [22] Pseudoaneurysm of the uterine artery post loop electrosurgical excision procedure
    Ong, Judith
    Lee, Kelvin
    Choo, Soe-Na
    Loh, Stanley
    Lim, Li Min
    Chen, Yee Yong
    Singh, Kuldip
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [23] The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome
    Samson, SLA
    Bentley, JR
    Fahey, TJ
    McKay, DJ
    Gill, GH
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (02): : 325 - 332
  • [24] Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
    Frey, Heather A.
    Stout, Molly J.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (01): : 39 - 45
  • [25] Predictors of Positive Margins at Time of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
    Liss, Jill
    Alston, Meredith
    Krull, Mona B.
    Mazzoni, Sara E.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2017, 21 (01) : 64 - 66
  • [26] Management of Cervical Dysplasia Using Office Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
    Ramirez, Sarah Ines
    Lutzkanin, Andrew
    PRIMARY CARE, 2021, 48 (04): : 583 - 595
  • [27] Vesicovaginal Fistula Following Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A Case Report
    Aubrey, Christa
    Sabourin, Jeanelle
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2018, 40 (10) : 1333 - 1336
  • [28] TREATMENT OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA USING THE LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE
    DUDLEY, BS
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 80 (01): : 157 - 157
  • [29] Interval From Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure to Pregnancy and Pregnancy Outcomes
    Conner, Shayna N.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (06): : 1154 - 1159
  • [30] Interpretation of loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimens: Do pathologists agree?
    Kimball, K. J.
    Conner, M. G.
    Stoler, M. H.
    Wright, T. C.
    Oster, R.
    Numnum, T. M.
    Estes, J. M.
    Straughn, J. M.
    Huh, W. K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (03) : S48 - S48