INTERMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP OF PEDIATRIC HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH ELEVATED PULMONARY VASCULAR-RESISTANCE INDEX

被引:29
|
作者
GAJARSKI, RJ
TOWBIN, JA
BRICKER, JT
RADOVANCEVIC, B
FRAZIER, OH
PRICE, JK
SCHOWENGERDT, KO
DENFIELD, SW
机构
[1] TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSP,BAYLOR COLL MED,DEPT PEDIAT,CARDIOL SECT,HOUSTON,TX 77030
[2] TEXAS HEART INST,DEPT CARDIOVASC SURG,HOUSTON,TX
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0735-1097(94)90675-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study examined perioperative and intermediate outcomes in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients who had elevated pulmonary vascular resistance indexes preoperatively. Background. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance was associated with poor outcome in previous studies and constitutes a relative contraindication to transplantation. Few studies have evaluated this poor outcome risk factor in pediatric patients. Methods. To evaluate outcomes of nonneonatal transplant recipients, records were reviewed and divided into Group I (preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance index greater than or equal to 6 units.m(2)) and Group II (pulmonary vascular resistance index <6 units.m(2)). Donor/recipient weight ratios, ischemic times, length of intensive care unit stay, posttransplantation infection rates, arrhythmia, response to pretransplantation vasodilator infusions and pulmonary vascular resistance indexes at the first and most recent posttransplantation biopsies were analyzed. Results. Group I (8 patients) had a mean (+/-SEM) pulmonary vascular resistance index of 11.5 +/- 3.5 units m(2); Group II (29 patients) had a mean pulmonary vascular resistance index of 2.3 +/- 0.4 units m(2) (p < 0.002). Pulmonary vascular resistance index decreased from 12.3 +/- 3.9 to 3.9 +/- 0.9 units.m(2) (p < 0.05) in 7 Group I patients undergoing vasodilator infusion during pretransplantation catheterization. Thirty-six orthotopic heart transplantations were performed and one heterotopic transplantation. Donor weights exceeded recipient weights by 13% and 31% for Groups I and II, respectively (p > 0.25). Donor ischemic time was 215 min for Group I and 225 min for Group II (p > 0.75). Intensive care unit stay was 11.5 days in Group I and 15.1 days in Group II (p = 0.20). Infection rate was 38% in both groups (p > 0.80). Arrhythmias occurred in 90% of Group I and 42% of Group II (p < 0.03) patients. Pulmonary resistance index in Group I decreased from 11.5 +/- 3.5 to 3.3 +/- 1.2 units.m(2) (p < 0.03) by the first posttransplantation biopsy and have not changed subsequently. During 2.3 years (range 0.3 to 8.5) of follow-up, the mortality rate was 25% and 21% for Groups I and II, respectively (p > 0.80). Conclusions. Group I patients did not require significantly oversized donors, restricted donor locations or longer intensive care unit stays or have higher infection rates; however, arrhythmias were more frequent. Pulmonary resistance index normalized early after transplantation. Pulmonary vascular reactivity may be more important for survival than absolute resistance index.
引用
收藏
页码:1682 / 1687
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Follow-Up of Lung and Heart Transplant Recipients with Pre-Transplant Malignancies
    Sigurdardottir, V.
    Bjortuft, O.
    Eiskjaer, H.
    Ekmehag, B.
    Gude, E.
    Gustafsson, F.
    Hagerman, I.
    Halme, M.
    Lommi, J.
    Mared, L.
    Riise, G. C.
    Simonsen, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (04): : S65 - S65
  • [22] What is high risk? Redefining elevated pulmonary vascular resistance index in pediatric heart transplantation
    Chiu, Peter
    Russo, Mark J.
    Davies, Ryan R.
    Addonizio, Linda J.
    Richmond, Marc E.
    Chen, Jonathan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [23] Long-term follow-up after total lymphoid irradiation in pediatric heart transplant recipients
    Chin, C
    Hunt, S
    Robbins, R
    Hoppe, R
    Reitz, B
    Bernstein, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 21 (06): : 667 - 673
  • [24] Determinants of renal function in pediatric heart transplant recipients: Long-term follow-up study
    Sachdeva, Ritu
    Blaszak, Richard T.
    Ainley, Kathryn A.
    Parker, James G.
    Morrow, William R.
    Frazier, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 26 (02): : 108 - 113
  • [25] USE OF SILDENAFIL IN TWO PEDIATRIC HEART TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES WITH CARDIOMYOPATHY AND ELEVATED PULMONARY VASCULAR RESISTANCE.
    Osmerova, Marie
    Malik, Petr
    Nemec, Petr
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 15 : 113 - 113
  • [26] Follow-up examination of 12 heart transplant recipients with cardiac CT
    Duan Shaoyin
    Yin Yongmei
    Sui Tong
    Cai Guoxiang
    Liao Chongxian
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (06) : 732 - 738
  • [27] Capability of nuclear medicine procedures in the follow-up of heart transplant recipients
    Puskas, C
    Kerber, S
    Weyand, M
    Schober, O
    [J]. NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (01): : 31 - 37
  • [28] EXPERIENCE OF OUTPATIENT FOLLOW-UP OF HEART TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS AT SHUMAKOV CENTER
    Muminov, I. I.
    Koloskova, N. N.
    Poptsov, V. N.
    Zakharevich, V. M.
    Mozheiko, N. P.
    Sakhovsky, S. A.
    Shevchenko, A. O.
    [J]. VESTNIK TRANSPLANTOLOGII I ISKUSSTVENNYH ORGANOV, 2023, 25 (03): : 68 - 75
  • [29] Follow-up after conversion to neoral in stable heart transplant recipients
    Pethig, K
    Geiger, M
    Korn, A
    Grote, M
    Christians, U
    Wahlers, T
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (04) : 2282 - 2284
  • [30] Role of dietary intervention and nutritional follow-up in heart transplant recipients
    Guida, Bruna
    Perrino, Nunzia Ruggiero
    Laccetti, Roberta
    Trio, Rossella
    Nastasi, Annamaria
    Pesola, Domenica
    Maiello, Ciro
    Marra, Claudio
    De Santo, Luca Salvatore
    Cotrufo, Maurizio
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 23 (01) : 101 - 107