QUALITATIVE MODELING AND FAULT-DIAGNOSIS OF DYNAMIC PROCESSES BY MIDAS

被引:15
|
作者
OYELEYE, OO
FINCH, FE
KRAMER, MA
机构
[1] Laboratory for Intelligent Systems Process Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
关键词
Alarm analysis; Causal reasoning; Deep knowledge expert systems; Fault diagnosis; Process safety;
D O I
10.1080/00986449008911492
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The Model Integrated Diagnostic Analysis System (MIDAS) is a program for diagnosing abnormal transient conditions in chemical, refinery, and utility systems. MIDAS employs causal reasoning using an event model derived from piping and instrumentation diagrams, and from quantitative process models. Root causes typically considered are equipment degradation and failure, incorrect manual actions, and external disturbances. By prompt and accurate diagnosis of these conditions, MIDAS can reduce the risk of safety hazards, material wastage, and unnecessary downtime. This paper extends and complements a previous report on MIDASt by detailing the qualitative modeling techniques used in MIDAS, and presenting the results of a simulation case study. The modeling methodology employs a new result on qualitative modeling to help resolve ambiguity from feedback loops and locate apparent “non-local causality”. The event model allows MIDAS to exploit the sequence of malfunction propagation in its internal reasoning. The models include control system responses and MIDAS uses this knowledge to correctly identify malfunctions even when the primary symptoms are concealed by control system compensations. The reasoning methodology used to perform the diagnosis is process independent. The case study reported involves diagnosis of a reactor-heat exchange process with associated control systems, with 10 sensors and over 100 potential malfunctions. The results show that MIDAS includes in its hypothesis set the correct malfunction 98.9% of the time. Of the scenarios tested, 40% exhibited control system compensation, 20% exhibited inverse response, and over 30% included out-of-order events. © 1990, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 228
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FAULT-DIAGNOSIS IN NONRECIPROCAL NETWORKS
    PLOTKIN, E
    ROYTMAN, LM
    SWAMY, MNS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUIT THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1982, 10 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [22] FAULT-DIAGNOSIS WITH IMPERFECT TESTS
    SHESKIN, TJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1981, 30 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [23] A GRAPH MODEL FOR FAULT-DIAGNOSIS
    TOIDA, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS, 1982, 6 (04): : 345 - 365
  • [24] BUS AND INSTRUCTION FAULT-DIAGNOSIS
    NARRAWAY, JJ
    VENKATESAN, R
    [J]. IEE PROCEEDINGS-E COMPUTERS AND DIGITAL TECHNIQUES, 1986, 133 (06): : 333 - 340
  • [25] MULTIFREQUENCY APPROACH TO FAULT-DIAGNOSIS
    SWAMY, MNS
    ROYTMAN, LM
    PLOTKIN, E
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIRCUIT THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1984, 12 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [26] Fuzzy rules based qualitative modelling: Application to fault diagnosis of dynamic processes
    Ouassir, M
    Melin, C
    [J]. ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES FOR REAL-TIME CONTROL 1997, 1997, : 311 - 312
  • [27] Fault-diagnosis of grid structures
    Caruso, A
    Chessa, S
    Maestrini, P
    Santi, P
    [J]. THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2003, 290 (02) : 1149 - 1174
  • [28] FAULT-DIAGNOSIS WITH PROCESS UNCERTAINTY
    DANAI, K
    CHIN, HY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (03): : 339 - 343
  • [29] FAULT-DIAGNOSIS IN A CHEMICAL PROCESS
    BARRACLOUGH, R
    [J]. CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION, 1989, 21 (06): : 69 - &
  • [30] FAULT-DIAGNOSIS IN THE DIGITAL STUDIO
    BRADSHAW, DJ
    [J]. SMPTE JOURNAL, 1989, 98 (03): : 164 - 167