COMPARISON OF A STANDARD REGIMEN (CHOP) WITH 3 INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA

被引:1767
|
作者
FISHER, RI
GAYNOR, ER
DAHLBERG, S
OKEN, MM
GROGAN, TM
MIZE, EM
GLICK, JH
COLTMAN, CA
MILLER, TP
机构
[1] LOYOLA UNIV, STRITCH SCH MED, MAYWOOD, IL 60153 USA
[2] SW ONCOL GRP, CTR STAT, SEATTLE, WA USA
[3] ABBOTT NW HOSP, VIRGINIA PIPER CANC INST, MINNEAPOLIS, MN USA
[4] UNIV ARIZONA, TUCSON, AZ 85721 USA
[5] UNIV PENN, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104 USA
[6] UNIV TEXAS, HLTH SCI CTR, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78284 USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 1993年 / 328卷 / 14期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199304083281404
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. CHOP is a first-generation, combination-chemotherapy regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone that has cured approximately 30 percent of patients with advanced stages of intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in national cooperative-group trials. However, studies at single institutions have suggested that 55 to 65 percent of such patients might be cured by third-generation regimens such as ones consisting of low-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (m-BACOD); prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide, followed by cytarabine, bleomycin, vincristine, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (ProMACE-CytaBOM); and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide; vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B). Methods. To make a valid comparison of these regimens, the Southwest Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group initiated a prospective, randomized phase III trial. The study end points were the response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and incidence of severe or life-threatening toxicity. Dose intensity was calculated and analyzed. Results. Of the 1138 patients registered for the trial, 899 were eligible. Each treatment group contained at least patients. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed among the groups. There were no significant differences among the groups in the rates of partial and complete response. At three years, 44 percent of all patients were alive without disease; there were no significant differences between the groups (41 percent in the CHOP and MACOP-B groups and 46 percent in the m-BACOD and ProMACE-CytaBOM groups; P = 0.35). Overall survival at three years was 52 percent (50 percent in the ProMACE-CytaBOM and MACOP-B groups, 52 percent in the m-BACOD group, and 54 percent in the CHOP group; P = 0.90). There was no subgroup of patients in which survival was improved by a third-generation regimen. Fatal toxic reactions occurred in 1 percent of the CHOP group, 3 percent of the ProMACE-CytaBOM group, 5 percent of the m-BACOD group, and 6 percent of the MACOP-B group (P = 0.09). Conclusions. CHOP remains the best available treatment for patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1006
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MACOP-B IN ADVANCED NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    ANG, PT
    SOH, LT
    SNG, I
    CHUA, EJ
    ONG, YW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1993, 16 (04): : 315 - 318
  • [32] SHORT INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY (COPE COMP) FOR INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    CARTWRIGHT, KD
    ARTHUR, CK
    MA, DDF
    ISBISTER, JP
    BLOOD, 1993, 82 (10) : A561 - A561
  • [33] Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma
    Tilly, H
    Lepage, E
    Coiffier, B
    Blanc, M
    Herbrecht, R
    Bosly, A
    Attal, M
    Fillet, G
    Guettier, C
    Molina, TJ
    Gisselbrecht, C
    Reyes, F
    BLOOD, 2003, 102 (13) : 4284 - 4289
  • [34] A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE GROWTH FRACTION IN NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    SCHRAPE, S
    JONES, DB
    WRIGHT, DH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 55 (03) : 283 - 286
  • [35] RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MACOP-B WITH CHOP IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    COOPER, IA
    WOLF, MM
    ROBERTSON, TI
    FOX, RM
    MATTHEWS, JP
    STONE, JM
    DING, JC
    DART, G
    MATTHEWS, J
    FIRKIN, FC
    LOWENTHAL, RM
    IRONSIDE, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) : 769 - 778
  • [36] THE EFFECT OF INTENSIVE INTERMITTENT MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN ADVANCED LOW-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    EZDINLI, EZ
    HARRINGTON, DP
    KUCUK, O
    SILVERSTEIN, MW
    ANDERSON, J
    OCONNELL, MJ
    CANCER, 1987, 60 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [37] CHEMOTHERAPY FOR HODGKINS-DISEASE AND AGGRESSIVE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA - MORE IS BETTER, OR IS IT
    DODWELL, DJ
    DECAMPOS, ES
    RADFORD, JA
    DRUGS, 1992, 44 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [38] CYTARABINE, CISPLATIN, AND ETOPOSIDE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR REFRACTORY NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    ODONNELL, MR
    FORMAN, SJ
    LEVINE, AM
    TERRITO, M
    FARBSTEIN, MJ
    FAHEY, JL
    GILL, P
    LAZAR, G
    NADEMANEE, A
    NEELY, S
    SNYDER, DS
    CANCER TREATMENT REPORTS, 1987, 71 (02): : 187 - 189
  • [39] COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY INCLUDING EPIRUBICIN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    ALISMAIL, SAD
    WHITTAKER, JA
    GOUGH, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 23 (09): : 1379 - 1384
  • [40] THROMBOEMBOLISM - A COMPLICATION OF WEEKLY CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA
    CLARKE, CS
    OTRIDGE, BW
    CARNEY, DN
    CANCER, 1990, 66 (09) : 2027 - 2030