THE PROCEDURE ABRIDGED IN THE CONTENTIOUS - ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION: CRITIQUES, PRAISES AND OFFERS

被引：0

作者：

Rando Burgos, Esther ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Malaga, Derecho Adm, Malaga, Spain

来源：

REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO | 2018年 / 48期

关键词：

administrative contentious order; abridged procedure; fundamental rights;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

The work reflects on the abbreviated procedure in the administrative contentious order, a procedural channel that, since its appearance with Law 29/1998, of July 13, of Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction and, after successive reforms, has gone from an almost residual application to be, by far, the procedure by which more resources are processed. It also analyzes one of the main reasons, that it has taken to the previous thing as well as the practical consequences that they come producing and that is precise to approach urgently in the measure in which enclosed they manage to concern fundamental rights.

引用

页数：29

共 22 条

[21] SUPREME COURT. ACTIVE LEGITIMATION OF LEGAL PERSONS. LACK OF ACCOMPANIMENT OF THE DOCUMENT THAT ACCREDITS THE FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED TO BRING ACTIONS. INADMISSIBILITY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTIOUS RESOURCE. NO REQUIREMENT OF SUBSANATION REQUIREMENT PRIOR TO SENTENCE. (ARTS. 45.2 D), 69 B) AND 138 OF LAW 29/1998, OF JULY 13, REGULATORY OF THE CONTENTIOUS-ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION)
Sardina Camara, Pablo
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO, 2010, (23):
[22] THE NOISE BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: ANOTHER CALL OF ATTENTION TO THE CONTENTIOUS-ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION (AND ALSO TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT): REMARKS ON MARTINEZ MARTINEZ VS. SPAIN: THE JUDGMENT OF THE ECTHR ON OCTOBER 18, 2011
Garcia Ureta, Agustin
ACTUALIDAD JURIDICA AMBIENTAL, 2011, (07): : 15 - 26

← 1 2 3 →