INTRAVESICAL 4'-EPIDOXORUBICIN (EPIRUBICIN) VERSUS BACILLUS-CALMETTE-GUERIN - A CONTROLLED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY ON THE PROPHYLAXIS OF SUPERFICIAL BLADDER-CANCER

Background. The selection of the most appropriate antineoplastic agent and optimal treatment schedule for the prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer against tumor recurrences is the subject of continual investigations. Methods. A controlled prospective trial involving 161 patients evaluated and compared the efficacy of intravesical epirubicin and bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) administration as prophylaxis against recurrences after complete transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer. The treatment schedule, consisting of one 6- or 8-week course of instillations (50 mg epirubicin or 150 mg BCG per instillation) followed by single maintenance doses to the responders at follow-up examinations, was modified for those of the initial responders who were at high risk for recurrence and who received an additional separate 4-week course of treatment 6 months after the start of therapy. Results. Sixty percent of the patients treated with epirubicin, 68% of the patients treated with BCG, and 41% of the control subjects, who underwent resection only, remained free of recurrences for a mean follow-up of 32.9 months. The only significant difference was found between patients treated with BCG and control subjects, in favor of the former. Conversely, recurrence rate per 100 patient-months and mean interval to recurrence showed both drugs to be superior to resection alone regarding several tumor characteristics. However, a significant benefit in favor of BCG when compared with epirubicin was shown in those patients who had Stage T1 and Grade 3 tumors at presentation. Conclusions. Intravesical epirubicin and BCG were superior to transurethral resection alone in the prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer, but with respect to superficially invasive and high-grade tumors, BCG demonstrated a remarkable advantage.