COMPARING DIRECT (EXPLICIT) AND INDIRECT (IMPLICIT) MEASURES TO STUDY UNCONSCIOUS MEMORY

被引:160
|
作者
MERIKLE, PM
REINGOLD, EM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.224
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Comparisons of the relative sensitivity of direct and indirect tasks can provide definitive evidence for unconscious memory when the direct and indirect tasks are matched on all characteristics except instructions. To demonstrate unconscious memory in normal adults, subjects first viewed pairs of words and named one cued word in each pair. During the subsequent assessment of memory, new words and either previously cued words (Experiment 1) or previously uncued words (Experiments 2A and 2B) were presented against a background mask. The subjects judged whether a word was old or new (direct task) or whether the contrast between a word and the mask was high or low (indirect task). For cued words, the direct task was more sensitive than the indirect task. However, for uncued words, the indirect task was initially more sensitive than the direct task, even though the direct task exhibited hypermnesia so that it became more sensitive than the indirect task across trial blocks. The greater initial sensitivity of the indirect task implicates unconscious processes underlying memory for the uncued words. These results indicate that unconscious processes in normal adults can be revealed through comparisons of comparable direct and indirect measures.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:224 / 233
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY IN CHILDREN - ARE AGE-DIFFERENCES ABSENT IN INDIRECT MEMORY RECALL TESTS
    WIPPICH, W
    MECKLENBRAUKER, S
    BRAUSCH, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENTWICKLUNGSPSYCHOLOGIE UND PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1989, 21 (04): : 294 - 306
  • [22] Indirect (implicit) and direct (explicit) self-esteem measures are virtually unrelated: A meta-analysis of the initial preference task
    Pietschnig, Jakob
    Gittler, Georg
    Stieger, Stefan
    Forster, Michael
    Gadek, Natalia
    Gartus, Andreas
    Kocsis-Bogar, Krisztina
    Kubicek, Bettina
    Lueftenegger, Marko
    Olsen, Jerome
    Prem, Roman
    Ruiz, Nina
    Serfas, Benjamin G.
    Voracek, Martin
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09):
  • [23] Stroop and mood/memory measures in the study of unconscious ''oneness''
    Sohlberg, S
    Arvidsson, M
    Birgegard, A
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1997, 85 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [24] ON UNCONSCIOUS AND CONSCIOUS THOUGHT AND THE ACCURACY OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT JUDGMENTS
    Ham, Jaap
    van den Bos, Kees
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2011, 29 (06) : 648 - 667
  • [25] Comparing the effects of stimulation and propofol infusion rate on implicit and explicit memory formation
    Andrade, J
    Englert, L
    Harper, C
    Edwards, ND
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [26] A longitudinal study of implicit and explicit memory in old persons
    Fleischman, DA
    Wilson, RS
    Gabrieli, JDE
    Bienias, JL
    Bennett, DA
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2004, 19 (04) : 617 - 625
  • [27] Modeling implicit and explicit memory
    Raaijmakers, JGW
    HUMAN LEARING AND MEMORY: ADVANCES IN THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2005, : 85 - 105
  • [28] Implicit and explicit memory in recognition
    Kostrubiec, V
    Samson, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 28439 - 28439
  • [29] Memory-based measures for assessing advertising effects: A comparison of explicit and implicit memory effects
    Shapiro, S
    Krishnan, HS
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2001, 30 (03) : 1 - 13
  • [30] IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY MODELS
    ROEDIGER, HL
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1979, 13 (06) : 339 - 342