Comparison of Foundation Design Specifications for Vibratory Machines

被引:4
|
作者
Bounds, William L. [1 ]
Wong, Silky S. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fluor Corp, Civil Struct Engn, One Fluor Daniel Dr, Sugar Land, TX 77478 USA
[2] Fluor Corp, One Fluor Daniel Dr, Sugar Land, TX 77478 USA
关键词
Machine foundations; Dynamic analysis; Soil impedance; Specifications; Structural design criteria; Vibration; Frequency; Amplitude; Block foundation; Tabletop structure;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000284
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Criteria for designing foundations for vibrating equipment come from published standards, recommended practices, internal company standards, and manufacturer requirements. The criteria from one source to another can vary significantly by including or omitting specific design recommendations or by providing different values for prescribed limitations. A comparison of amplitude criteria and several discussions of different practices and approaches can be found in ACI 351.3R, Foundations for Dynamic Equipment. With an update of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) report in progress, this paper provides updated comparative data between selected currently published and company specifications. Criterion topics include when a dynamic analysis is required, machine vibration limits, human vibration limits, resonant frequency range, geotechnical impedance calculation methods, and foundation sizing criteria. In addition, the background and merits of specific criteria are discussed in the paper to provide some insights on the development of criteria. The information herein provides a frame of reference for what design criteria are considered industry standard. Permissible amplitude figures are provided for users to compare with their proposed project specifications. Several recommendations for the development of project specifications are included. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of railway track foundation design methods
    Burrow, M. P. N.
    Bowness, D.
    Ghataora, G. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2007, 221 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [22] A comparison of railway track foundation design methods
    Department of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    不详
    不详
    Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 1 (1-12):
  • [23] Checking JML specifications with B machines
    Bouquet, F
    Dadeau, F
    Groslambert, J
    ZB 2005: FORMAL SPECIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN Z AND B, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3455 : 434 - 453
  • [24] Design and Comparison of Vernier Permanent Magnet Machines
    Ho, S. L.
    Niu, Shuangxia
    Fu, W. N.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2011, 47 (10) : 3280 - 3283
  • [25] Analysis, comparison and design of role-based security specifications
    Castano, S
    Martella, G
    Samarati, P
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 1996, 21 (01) : 31 - 55
  • [26] A comparison of OO and Reactive based specifications on the Design of Embedded Systems
    Ito, SA
    de Mattos, JCB
    Carro, L
    Toscani, SS
    13TH SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 391 - 396
  • [27] Analysis, comparison and design of role-based security specifications
    Universita di Milano, Milano, Italy
    Data Knowl Eng, 1 (31-55):
  • [28] Design specifications
    Sepakat Setia Perunding
    不详
    Tunn. Tunn. Int., 2006, SUPPL. MAY (9-10):
  • [29] Optimal design of geometrical and physical parameters of permanent magnet machines in the purpose to reduce its vibratory behavior
    Ferkha, N.
    Mekideche, M. R.
    Miraoui, A.
    Djerdir, A.
    N-Diaye, A. O.
    Peyraut, F.
    2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS (EPECS), 2013,
  • [30] Design and validation of a C plus plus code generator from Abstract State Machines specifications
    Bonfanti, Silvia
    Gargantini, Angelo
    Mashkoor, Atif
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2020, 32 (02)