SCREENING FOR FETAL ANOMALIES DURING THE 1ST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY - TRANSVAGINAL VERSUS TRANSABDOMINAL SONOGRAPHY

被引:52
|
作者
ACHIRON, R
TADMOR, O
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem
关键词
ULTRASOUND; TRANSVAGINAL; TRANSABDOMINAL; FETAL ANOMALIES; 1ST TRIMESTER;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01030186.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Ultrasound is a sensitive tool for the diagnosis of fetal anomalies during the prenatal period. Most knowledge about the ultrasound images of such anomalies is based on abdominal scanning during the second trimester of pregnancy. The value of transvaginal sonography for evaluating fetal anomalies and a comparison with transabdominal sonography in the first trimester has, to our knowledge, so far not been studied. During a 12-month period, 800 pregnant women between 9 and 13 weeks of gestation, underwent first a transabdominal scan followed by a transvaginal examination, in order to compare the value of the two techniques. Eight cases of fetal abnormality, including anencephaly, exencephaly, cervical myelomeningocele, cystic hygroma, omphalocele, posterior fossa cyst and syndactyly, were diagnosed by using the transvaginal sonographic approach. The standard abdominal technique failed to detect four of these anomalies, while in the other four only vague and non-specific fetal abnormalities could be demonstrated. All women with normal abdominal and vaginal sonograms in the first trimester were rescreened transabdominally at mid-gestation. Five patients with a variety of fetal anomalies, including hydrocephalus, agenesis of corpus callosum, bilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction, right heart hypoplasia and tetralogy of Fallot, were identified in the rescreening procedure. One case of ventricular septal defect and coarctation of the aorta was not detected at either of the first or second screening procedures. Our findings show that transvaginal sonography is more sensitive than transabdominal sonography in the detection of first-trimester anomalies. However, since not all fetal anomalies are manifest so early in pregnancy, standard abdominal sonography in the second trimester is still recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 191
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RELIABILITY OF TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND IN DETECTING 1ST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY ABNORMALITIES
    JARJOUR, L
    KLETZKY, OA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1991, 56 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [22] FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY - ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS IN 1ST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY
    NICOLAIDES, KH
    AZAR, G
    BYRNE, D
    MANSUR, C
    MARKS, K
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6831): : 867 - 869
  • [23] Transabdominal fetoscopy in fetal anomalies diagnosed by ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy
    Ville, Y
    Bernard, JP
    Doumerc, S
    Multon, O
    Fernandez, H
    Frydman, R
    Barki, G
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 8 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [24] Transperineal versus transvaginal sonography during pregnancy
    Zilianti, M
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (01) : 101 - 101
  • [25] TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHIC DETECTION OF SKELETAL ANOMALIES IN THE 1ST TRIMESTER AND EARLY 2ND TRIMESTER
    BRONSHTEIN, M
    KERET, D
    DEUTSCH, M
    LIBERSON, A
    BARCHAVA, I
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 13 (07) : 597 - 601
  • [26] FETAL THORACOMETRY BY MEANS OF ULTRASOUND IN 1ST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY
    SCHILLINGER, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1977, 7 (02): : 73 - 78
  • [28] TRANSABDOMINAL CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING FOR 1ST TRIMESTER FETAL DIAGNOSIS - 1ST 26 PREGNANCIES FOLLOWED TO TERM
    SMIDTJENSEN, S
    HAHNEMANN, N
    HARIRI, J
    JENSEN, PKA
    THERKELSEN, AJ
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1986, 6 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [29] 1ST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY
    DAVID, ML
    DOYLE, EW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1976, 76 (12) : 1945 - 1948
  • [30] TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY - DETECTION OF FINDINGS SUGGESTIVE OF FETAL CHROMOSOMAL-ANOMALIES IN THE 1ST AND EARLY 2ND TRIMESTERS
    BRONSHTEIN, M
    BLUMENFELD, Z
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1992, 12 (07) : 587 - 593