Combination Treatment of Glioblastoma by Low-Dose Radiation and Genistein

被引:7
|
作者
Atefeh, Zamanian [1 ]
Vahid, Changizi [1 ]
Hasan, Nedaie [2 ]
Saeed, Amanpour [3 ]
Mahnaz, Haddadi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Allied Med Sci, Dept Technol Radiol & Radiotherapy, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Inst Canc, Radiotherapy Oncol & Radiobiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Canc Inst Iran, Canc Models Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Fractionated radiotherapy; GBM; genistein; glioblastoma; HRS; IRR; Low-dose Hyper-radiosensitivity;
D O I
10.2174/1874471009666160813232031
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose: Gioblastoma multiforme as a chemoresistant and radioresistant malignant cell line needs to novel strategies to treatment. Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity (LDHRS) seems to be an effective phenomenon to irradiation that can save normal brain fibroblasts. Genistein which is a soy isoflavone can be cytotoxic in some tumor cell lines. So we determined to study the effect of combining these two treatment modalities. Materials and Methods: After 30 hours incubation with Genistein in different concentrations on U87MG cell line, proliferation and clonogenicity were conducted by both clonogenic and MTT assays. A conventional 2Gy radiation dose was compared with 10 doses of 0.2Gy gamma irradiation with 3 minutes and 1 hour intervals. Finally, concurrent effect of these modalities was assessed. Results: Based on acquired cell doubling time (30 hours), one doubling time treatment by Genistein could decrease clonogenicity. U87MG cell line exhibited HRS at low dose irradiations. 2Gy irradiation was more effective than ultra-fractionation methods in comparison with control group. All groups with 50uM concentration of Genistein showed decrease in the survival. This decrease compared with control group, in 10x0.2Gy with 3 minutes intervals plus 50uM Genistein was significant and for groups with the same dose of Genistein but along with continuous 2Gy was more significant. Conclusion: In one day treatment regimen, 10x0.2Gy ultra-fractionation with 3 minutes and 1 hour intervals seems to be less effective than conventional 2Gy irradiation, however adding 50uM Genistein can decrease survival more. Although 2Gy conventional dose plus 50uM Genistein was the most effective regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 263
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LOW-DOSE ATENOLOL-CHLORTHALIDONE COMBINATION FOR TREATMENT OF MILD HYPERTENSION
    LEONETTI, G
    PASOTTI, C
    CAPRA, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1986, 24 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [42] Not Every Low-Dose Is Low-Dose: Impact of Revising Low-Dose CT Protocol on Mean Effective Radiation Exposure
    Deyirmendjian, Claudia
    Lee, Seohyuk
    Noureldin, Yasser A.
    Hegyi, Gyorgy
    Stein, Lawrence
    Artho, Giovanni
    Andonian, Sero
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (06) : 835 - 840
  • [43] RISKS OF RADIATION AT LOW-DOSE RATES
    BAVERSTOCK, KF
    PAPWORTH, D
    VENNART, J
    LANCET, 1981, 1 (8217): : 430 - 432
  • [44] Low-dose Radiation Therapy for Osteoarthritis
    Ma, Guo-Rong
    Yang, Yong-Ze
    Meng, Xin
    Gao, Yu-Ting
    Li, Shu-Zhi
    Guo, Hong-Zhang
    Jin, Xiao-Dong
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2024, 51 (06) : 1382 - 1392
  • [45] LOW-DOSE RADIATION - HANFORD EVIDENCE
    STEWART, A
    LANCET, 1978, 1 (8072): : 1048 - 1049
  • [46] Low-dose radiation of a symptomatic lymphocele
    Neu, B.
    Sautter-Bihl, M.-L.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 183 : 148 - 148
  • [47] RISKS OF RADIATION AT LOW-DOSE RATES
    STEWART, AM
    LANCET, 1981, 1 (8228): : 1054 - 1054
  • [48] LOW-DOSE RADIATION RESTUDY CHALLENGED
    BROSS, IDJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1982, 72 (11) : 1300 - 1301
  • [49] LOW-DOSE PRETREATMENT FOR RADIATION THERAPY
    Blankenbecler, Richard
    DOSE-RESPONSE, 2010, 8 (04): : 534 - 542
  • [50] Carcinogenesis induced by low-dose radiation
    Piotrowski, Igor
    Kulcenty, Katarzyna
    Suchorska, Wiktoria Maria
    Skrobala, Agnieszka
    Skorska, Malgorzata
    Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta
    Kowalik, Anna
    Jackowiak, Weronika
    Malicki, Julian
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 51 (04) : 369 - 377