PREDICTORS OF BEEF TENDERNESS AMONG CARCASSES PRODUCED UNDER COMMERCIAL CONDITIONS

被引:42
|
作者
JONES, BK
TATUM, JD
机构
[1] Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University
关键词
BEEF; TENDERNESS; PH; CARCASS; FAT THICKNESS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.2527/1994.7261492x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Beef carcasses (n = 240), processed using conventional commercial procedures and selected to differ in weight and s.c. fat thickness, were used to evaluate marbling score, s.c. fat thickness, 3-h pH (pH(3)) of the longissimus muscle (LM), and early-postmortem measurements of LM temperature as predictors of rib steak tenderness. Of the carcass traits evaluated, marbling score was the best single predictor of shear force (WBS) and panel ratings for myofibrillar tenderness (MFT). However, marbling, used alone, accounted for only 9.0 and 5.1% of the variation in WBS and MFT, respectively, and was not associated with panel ratings for connective tissue amount (CTA). Including pH(3) in the prediction equation for WBS increased the R(2) to .115, and inclusion of s.c. fat thickness in the equation for MFT increased the R(2) to .062. Ratings for CTA were most effectively predicted using a regression equation that included 9-h LM temperature, pH(3), and s.c. fat thickness (R(2) = .063). Marbling score was the most effective factor evaluated for classifying carcasses into tenderness groups. Use of a minimum fat thickness constraint of .5 cm was effective for identifying tenderness differences among Select grade carcasses but was less effective within the Choice grade. Compared with marbling and s.c. fat thickness, pH(3) was less effective for use in classifying carcasses into tenderness groups; however, pH(3) values below 6.2 were associated with a reduction in tenderness variation. Measurements of early-postmortem LM temperature were not effective for use in identifying differences in tenderness.
引用
收藏
页码:1492 / 1501
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality evaluation of beef carcasses produced under tropical conditions of Mexico
    Zorrilla-Rios, J. M.
    Lancaster, P. A.
    Goad, C. L.
    Horn, G. W.
    Hilton, G. G.
    Galindo, J. G.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (01) : 477 - 482
  • [2] High-quality beef produced under ecological conditions -: Investigation of the microbiological quality of carcasses
    Bräunig, I
    Matthes, HD
    ARCHIV FUR LEBENSMITTELHYGIENE, 2002, 53 (01): : 15 - 17
  • [3] TENDERNESS VARIATIONS AMONG BEEF STEAKS FROM CARCASSES OF THE SAME USDA QUALITY GRADE
    DAVIS, GW
    SMITH, GC
    CARPENTER, ZL
    DUTSON, TR
    CROSS, HR
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1979, 49 (01) : 103 - 114
  • [4] Prerigor carcass muscle stretching effects on tenderness of grain-fed beef under commercial conditions
    Claus, JR
    Wang, HJ
    Marriott, NG
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1997, 62 (06) : 1231 - 1234
  • [5] PREDICTORS OF BEEF TENDERNESS - DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION
    SHACKELFORD, SD
    KOOHMARAIE, M
    WHIPPLE, G
    WHEELER, TL
    MILLER, MF
    CROUSE, JD
    REAGAN, JO
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1991, 56 (05) : 1130 - &
  • [6] Tenderness classification of beef: II. Design and analysis of a system to measure beef longissimus shear force under commercial processing conditions
    Shackelford, SD
    Wheeler, TL
    Koohmaraie, M
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1999, 77 (06) : 1474 - 1481
  • [7] Analysis of the commercial grades for beef carcasses
    Bohuslávek, Z
    CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 47 (03) : 112 - 118
  • [8] EQUATIONS FOR PREDICTING TENDERNESS IN BEEF CARCASSES OF DIFFERENT PHYSIOLOGICAL MATURITY
    BERRV, BW
    SMITH, GC
    CARPENTE.ZL
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1973, 37 (01) : 257 - 257
  • [9] EFFECT OF BONING BEEF CARCASSES PRIOR TO CHILLING ON MEAT TENDERNESS
    FALK, SN
    HENRICKSON, RL
    MORRISON, RD
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1975, 40 (05) : 1075 - 1079
  • [10] Evaluation of the Tendertec beef grading instrument to predict the tenderness of steaks from beef carcasses
    Belk, KE
    George, MH
    Tatum, JD
    Hilton, GG
    Miller, RK
    Koohmaraie, M
    Reagan, JO
    Smith, GC
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 79 (03) : 688 - 697