EXPRESSION OF THE HOX-2.2 HOMEOBOX GENE IN MURINE EMBRYONIC EPIDERMIS

被引:24
|
作者
MATHEWS, CHE
DETMER, K
LAWRENCE, HJ
LARGMAN, C
机构
[1] SAN FRANCISCO VA MED CTR, 4150 CLEMENT ST, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121 USA
[2] UC DAVIS, SCH MED, DEPT INTERNAL MED, DAVIS, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-0436.1993.tb00628.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The expression of the Hox 2.2 gene was studied in mouse fetal skin by in situ hybridization with an anti-sense RNA probe derived from the homeobox region of this gene. In contrast to the expression of Hox 2.2 in spinal cord, which is strongest in 11-day embryos, and is greatly diminished by day 14 and day 17, the signal for Hox 2.2 in skin could be not be detected in 11-day epidermis, was barely detectable on day 14, became strong on day 17, and decreased in new-born animals (day 19). RNase protection assays using Hox 2.2 homeobox-containing and 3' flanking region probes confirmed that the signals detected in 17-day fetal skin by in situ hybridization represent Hox 2.2 transcripts, and that the message is expressed throughout the day 15 to day 18 period during which the epidermis is undergoing terminal differentiation. RNase protection analysis also revealed two alternatively spliced forms of the Hox 2.2 mRNA are present throughout fetal skin development. Northern gel analysis of 17-day fetal skin using a Hox 2.2 homeobox-containing probe at high stringency showed two bands of 1.6 and 1.9 kb, respectively. The 1.9 kb band was greatly enhanced by hybridization at reduced stringency, suggesting the expression of additional homeobox genes with homology to Hox 2.2. These results suggest that the Hox 2.2 homeobox gene plays a role in epidermal development.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:177 / 184
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DISRUPTION OF THE MURINE HOMEOBOX GENE CDX1 AFFECTS AXIAL SKELETAL IDENTITIES BY ALTERING THE MESODERMAL EXPRESSION DOMAINS OF HOX GENES
    SUBRAMANIAN, V
    MEYER, BI
    GRUSS, P
    CELL, 1995, 83 (04) : 641 - 653
  • [32] HOX-7, A MOUSE HOMEOBOX GENE WITH A NOVEL PATTERN OF EXPRESSION DURING EMBRYOGENESIS
    ROBERT, B
    SASSOON, D
    JACQ, B
    GEHRING, W
    BUCKINGHAM, M
    EMBO JOURNAL, 1989, 8 (01): : 91 - 100
  • [33] SPECIFIC EXPRESSION OF THE HOX-1.3 HOMEO BOX GENE IN MURINE EMBRYONIC STRUCTURES ORIGINATING FROM OR INDUCED BY THE MESODERM
    DONY, C
    GRUSS, P
    EMBO JOURNAL, 1987, 6 (10): : 2965 - 2975
  • [34] Hox gene expression profiles during embryonic development of common sole
    Kavouras, Menelaos
    Malandrakis, Emmanouil E.
    Golomazou, Eleni
    Konstantinidis, Ioannis
    Blom, Ewout
    Palstra, Arjan P.
    Anastassiadis, Konstantinos
    Panagiotaki, Panagiota
    Exadactylos, Athanasios
    ANIMAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 69 (02) : 183 - 198
  • [35] EXPRESSION PATTERN OF A MURINE HOMEOBOX GENE, DBX, DISPLAYS EXTREME SPATIAL RESTRICTION IN EMBRYONIC FOREBRAIN AND SPINAL-CORD
    LU, S
    BOGARAD, LD
    MURTHA, MT
    RUDDLE, FH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1992, 89 (17) : 8053 - 8057
  • [36] THE HOX11 HOMEOBOX-CONTAINING GENE OF HUMAN LEUKEMIA IMMORTALIZES MURINE HEMATOPOIETIC PRECURSORS
    HAWLEY, RG
    FONG, AZC
    LU, M
    HAWLEY, TS
    ONCOGENE, 1994, 9 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [37] REGULATION OF HOMEOBOX GENE-EXPRESSION DURING EMBRYONIC INDUCTION OF THE EYE
    SUNDIN, O
    LI, HS
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 1456 - 1456
  • [38] Beyond the Hox: how widespread is homeobox gene clustering?
    Holland, PWH
    JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2001, 199 : 13 - 23
  • [39] Differential Hox Expression in Murine Embryonic Stem Cell Models of Normal and Malignant Hematopoiesis
    Wheadon, Helen
    Ramsey, Joanne M.
    Dobbin, Edwina
    Dickson, Glenda J.
    Corrigan, Pamela M.
    Freeburn, Robin W.
    Thompson, Alexander
    STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 20 (08) : 1465 - 1476
  • [40] OVER-EXPRESSION OF HOX-8, THE HUMAN HOMOLOG OF THE MOUSE HOX-8 HOMEOBOX GENE, IN HUMAN TUMORS
    SUZUKI, M
    TANAKA, M
    IWASE, T
    NAITO, Y
    SUGIMURA, H
    KINO, I
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1993, 194 (01) : 187 - 193